Researchers found low concentrations of so-called forever chemicals in various “eco-friendly” straws, raising doubts about whether they’re an appropriate alternative.

  • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    No doubt. But something with a smaller hole in it, like the newer Starbucks (I’m sorry I hate using them as an example) cold cups works fine with ice too. Hell, something shaped like the top of a soda can would do it, no more difficult to make than the straw accepting lids, and then no straws.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those stsrbucks cups are fairly thick, like more than the amount of plastic in a straw thick. Is that really better overall?

      • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did you read what I said? I said I hate using Starbucks as an example. It just happened to be the first thing that came to mind, that everyone would know what I was talking about. Yes, Starbucks sucks, and so do their plastic products, BUT as I said, that STYLE is what I was talking about. In fact, I said something more like the top of a soda can would be good.

    • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not difficult to make, but they do require more plastic. Probably about the same amount of additional plastic as a straw, really. It’s funny to me when people only consider part of the equation and not the whole thing.

      • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I’m concerned, plastic lids/cups should go away too. I’m simply pointing out that straws are useless, and if anyone cared enough, it would be pretty simple to resolve the straw issue.

        • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calling straws useless is a bit much. They’re usually excessive, but not useless. Ask your grandmother who can no longer drink from a glass properly. Or a quadriplegic.

          There’s nuance in everything, my friend. You’d serve the world better to acknowledge it rather than speak in absolutes.

          • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            so, people who existed before the advent of the plastic straw just all died of dehydration? GTFO of here with that shit.

            Yes, straws are convenient, and can be helpful to people with certain disabilities. However, that’s a small subset of the population, and they can use reuasble straws, if they need them. Plastic/disposable straws are useless.

            • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This isn’t even a fair argument. The subset of people I refer to who benefit from straws would have had a whole host of different things working against them pre-straws. Sort of a silly strawman because that’s not my point. I honestly think you just forgot to qualify a previous statement by emphasizing that you think plastic straws are useless and not all straws are useless. I was responding to your blanket statement that straws are useless.

              I agree that disposable straws are useless, no disagreement there. It’s why I own metal ones. I disagree that straws themselves are useless. They are useful.

              • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                This comment thread is about disposable/plastic straws. I have been talking about getting rid of plastic/disposable straws in every comment. I never implied I was talking about reusable. I didn’t know I needed to be so pedantic.

                • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Jesus man, ok. Let’s get pedantic about this. I’m sick, I’ve got time.

                  Parent comment of this thread is:

                  Disposable products are gonna have problems to keep them cheap. The solution to straws is non-dispossble straws, always was.

                  Also this is still a silly topic, straws won’t save the planet.

                  So, on the table are both forms of straws. In fact, the immediate response to the parent comment leads with

                  Or stop using straws all together.

                  A few comments later you say

                  Straws are useless

                  To which I call you out and point out that they do, in fact, have a use. Instead of just conceding that they do have a use for a subset of the population, and aren’t totally useless, you pivot to disposable.

                  In context of this conversation, you absolutely need to qualify if you are talking about all straws or just disposable straws. That’s literally the conversation being had. You just seem to not like that someone pointed out a flaw to your logic. It’s fine to have someone offer different perspectives that cause you to refine your position. Nothing wrong with that. That was my whole point about acknowledging nuance.