• Kusarihime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a shame, I really enjoyed the show but I m glad there’s consequences for Neil Gaiman. He’s an absolute monster.

    Now if everyone could treat Joanne the same that’d be just great.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I will probably watch it because it’s one of my favourite comic stories adapted really well, but other than that, Gaimam will never get another cent from me.

      Same for Rowling, though that’s easier because outside of Potter she has only written utter trash (including these abominations of prequel movies).

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    TL;DR the accusations against Neil Gaiman played no role in the ending of the series according to the showrunner.

  • Rodneyck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    One of my favorite series. Netflix’s tagline should be, ‘We Cancel, Because We Can!’

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I understand the allegations involved, but I’m still sad this show is being cancelled.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree… I hate that we can still get flooded with new Harry Potter content, but Neil Gaiman IP is now off limits.

      I want to live in a world where people aren’t shit.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, Rowling is a shit, but as far as I know she’s never laid hands on anyone. She can cause a lot of harm with hateful words and her significant public exposure, but that’s a different kind of thing.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not getting canceled. They’re finishing the story where they were planning to.

  • RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So the show is getting a proper ending or is it just ending? If it is just ending abruptly I wont bother watching any more of it.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds like it was always going to get a proper ending. From the article:

      “It was a decision we made three years ago,” Heinberg shared about when the call was made to wrap the series with two seasons. Based on his conversation and reporting from EW, Warner Bros. Television had a writers’ room in place to chart out where the adaptation could be heading before the first season premiered. Heinberg shared that “lots of different versions of what season 2 could be,” were put into play before the decision was made to focus on Sturridge’s Dream. “There are some volumes where he just appears in two scenes,” Heiberg explained, noting how focusing on Dream’s direct story reduced the amount of source material dramatically. “There’s so many protagonists in Sandman, but you think of the whole thing as his story.”

      “It turned out to be about another season’s worth of story, without leaving out anybody’s favorite moments or scenes. We managed to add a great deal of material, as we did in season 1, and a lot of really fun surprises for fans of the comics who know the entire story. We pulled from a lot of different sources. We took a lot of the single-issue stories and wove them into the fabric of Dream’s narrative,” Heinberg continued.