fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agoBaldur's Gaytemander.xyzimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up11.04K
arrow-up11.04KimageBaldur's Gaytemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareCrankenstein@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up106·7 months agoThis is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·7 months agoI think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole. I would be fewer holes, though.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoBut there’s more hole per hole
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoWhat gets bigger, the more you take away from it? My love for a blue Dwarf.
This is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
I think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole.
I would be fewer holes, though.
But there’s more hole per hole
What gets bigger, the more you take away from it?
My love for a blue Dwarf.