I would like for us to be in the treaties, but it would be foolish as we border Russia, and they just won’t respect any treaties.
I linked it so that people can read about why there is a treaty to begin with. Same with anti-personnel landmines. Hell, I should probably go and take a refresher course, because when I was doing my service, we weren’t taught shit about AP mines, because geopolitical situation was a bit more chill and we respected the treaty.
I do recall some of the older lieutenants saying something like “we won’t be teaching you about AP mines, although in practice, if Russia ever does start being threatening, we’ll probably back out of the treaty anyway”. Which we did.
But yeah, comment’s just here to generate conversation about why Putler is such a bastard.
I’m aware, thanks.
I’m Finnish.
I would like for us to be in the treaties, but it would be foolish as we border Russia, and they just won’t respect any treaties.
I linked it so that people can read about why there is a treaty to begin with. Same with anti-personnel landmines. Hell, I should probably go and take a refresher course, because when I was doing my service, we weren’t taught shit about AP mines, because geopolitical situation was a bit more chill and we respected the treaty.
I do recall some of the older lieutenants saying something like “we won’t be teaching you about AP mines, although in practice, if Russia ever does start being threatening, we’ll probably back out of the treaty anyway”. Which we did.
But yeah, comment’s just here to generate conversation about why Putler is such a bastard.
Command detonated mines don’t fall under Ottawa treaty, so you might have had them (these are both claymore-type and OZM72-type)
Except I know exactly what we trained with, and I know we didn’t…?
We only trained and got trained to train in the use of AA mines. (10 kilos each, btw, and a fighter carries two.)
Edit thanks for the added info to the thread tho