• esa@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Between that and the uutils-coreutils, Ubuntu 25.10 sounds like it’ll be an interesting experience for users, especially those with accessibility and internationalisation needs.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well, they do recommend using LTS releases and the specifically change stuff more drastically on the release before the next LTS release.

    • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I fully agree with you on the accessibility front. It’s not even good on X11, but it’s unusable on Wayland, from what I understand :( Accessibility on Linux needs a massive funding and development initiative, and it needed to be done a long time ago.

      But uutils is pretty solid. I’ve swapped out my GNU coreutils entirely (on Arch, not Ubuntu, because I value my time too much to be troubleshooting broken snaps) and haven’t run into any issues. I think people are underestimating how close the compatibility already is. I’m sure something I use at some point will try to invoke an option that doesn’t exist in the uutils version, but it’s been solid for me so far.

      • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, I think those are just lacking in the internationalisation?

        People like me, who at most have some reading glasses needs and have their computer set to generally English utf-8 will be likely be fine.

        • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          internationalization

          Interesting point. I don’t actually know about that. What can the GNU coreutils do with regard to internationalization? Just the output of commands, or can they also internationalize stuff like command args?

          • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I’m generally an en_*.UTF-8 user (even tried en_DK.UTF-8 for a bit for a reason we’ll come back to), so I don’t have a complete picture of it and would have to go look at the documentation or source for that, but I’d expect

            • documentation
            • date formats: en_DK.UTF-8 should give you ISO8601-formatted dates, if I can’t have that I at least want DD/MM/YYYY; the US-american nonsense is just plain unacceptable
            • sorting: e.g. Norwegian will have …zæøå and expect aa to be sorted as å, the Swedes have …zåöä, the Germans …zäöü, the Turks will want ı and İ sorted and upper/lowercased correctly, and there are some options around how you deal with “foreign” letters and diacritics.
            • Probably more stuff relating to LC_* that I can’t think of off the top of my head

            but in any case, an ls -l output should be different depending on your locale, and in ways you likely don’t even think about as long as it looks normal.

  • wagesj45@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Hope they’re gonna devote the development resources to making it actually work.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      18 hours ago

      While it actually works, there are truly some missing features obviously. The hope is, when lot of major distributions and desktop environments stop supporting X11, then application developers and Wayland developers have to find a solution quicker. This will accelerate development of Wayland, at least the remaining issues.

      One area where Wayland needs to improve is support for various accessibility features.

      • notabot@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That does feel rther like jumping out of a plane and hoping you can finish making your paracute before it’s too late.

        The concept of moving on from X11 is a good one, but making Wayland just a protocol that every compositor has to implement separately, and having so many optional larts to the spec seems like a guarantee that the ecosystem around it will never properly mature.

        The KiCad developers have a good article about some of the issues with Wayland here.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is big “if we break your old toys, you’ll HAVE to play with the new ones” energy.

        Tell me when they port FVWM. Seriously. FvwmButtons-- a pretty trivial dock except it can swallow other windows-- seems like it would be out-of-bounds on Wayland unless it was owned by the compositor itself to access the other windows. I don’t see any of the new taskbar-tools used with Wayland compositors offering similar functionality (I could be wrong) and that seems an amazing loss of feature parity.

      • endlessvoid@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Remote desktop support is buggy on gnome and nearly non-existant on other DE’s, which speaks to how poor a job wayland does at managing functions between DE’s, where each individual DE has to build their own solution for basic functions, further fragmenting development efforts.

        Then there’s accessibility functions, which wayland breaks almost by design by denying apps access to each other. Even something as simple as an on screen keyboard becomes nearly impossible to implement.

        Any software thats being pushed to users as the “main” experience, should not break things as common and fundemental as remote desktop or onscreen keyboards. Great way to drive away potential users switching from windows 10.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I think it boils down to trade offs.

          The major benefit to Wayland is that it has less overhead since apps talk directly to the desktop. Having desktops implement the protocols instead of relying on a external project means that the user experience is cleaner.

          For smaller projects like window managers there are libraries that implement the core protocols. This allows for the minimal window managers Linux traditionally had as an option.

          I won’t argue that Wayland has issues with remote desktop. The problem currently is that it has to be implemented as a custom non standardized solution by every desktop. I don’t think that there are any portals for doing session management which is unfortunate.

          From a accessibility perspective I believe that has already been addressed.

          I also don’t see any reason to try to “market” Linux. Windows 11 is the successor to Windows 10. It isn’t that bad compared to ever other version of Windows.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          13 hours ago

          As someone who’s a week into trying to switch from Windows to Linux, I don’t even know what X11 or Wayland are. My biggest hurdle has been how the Linux community always just assumes everyone knows every little thing. This article is a perfect example. It would have taken a sentence or two to add “X11 does this, but is being phased out”.

          I spent at least an hour today trying to connect to a shared network printer! As a geek, I love Linux but it’s still not ready for the masses. And that’s referring to Mint.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Honestly, that’s not something you should have to know about. Many Linux folks just care about the inner workings of everything so they can make it work how they want.

            Of course, when things break it helps knowing what the reason is and how to fix it. But usually your distribution should handle everything so that nothing breaks.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I agree with your first part, but I dont think I’ve ever used a windows, osx or linux computer that hasnt had issues connecting to printers, the problem there isnt with the computer.

            • It probably depends on the printer. I helped dad install Mint on a used laptop he bought, and the only help he needed with the printer was figuring out which config application to open to add it.

              I use system-config-printer to set up both our Canon and Epson printers any time I install a fresh Linux here; it works flawlessly.

          • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            X11 is the display server. Your desktop environment, like gnome, has a window manager managing your opened applications and tells the display server “please render this stuff on the actual screen”.

            X11 is ancient and sucks, because for example, it can’t do fractional scaling well, which is important for screens that have a higher resolution, since everything appears tiny otherwise.

            The display server also offers some functionalities that the desktop environment can make use of, like global hotkeys, or screen sharing.

            I’m not an expert or anything, but I think it’s about right like this.

      • cornshark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        When I resume chrome, all the windows open on desktop 1 regardless of what desktop they were on when they closed

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s a known Wayland limitation

          It has been addressed with a new protocol but it takes time for it to work its way down.

        • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Isn’t Chrome still an X11 app? I guess Chrome would be one of the bigger programs that need a little more encouragement to finally jump onto Wayland.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ctrl+Shift+V in KeePassXC should autotype username and password in another window, but I believe is still broken out of the box on Wayland.

        There may be some workaround that I haven’t tried yet.

          • Russ@bitforged.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I’d be highly surprised if Wayland actually has a protocol for applications to just type across other applications, we barely even have global shortcuts (it’s getting there but reaaaaaally slowly).

            KPXC might be able to get around it by using whichever method ydotool does (by faking a device AFAIK) - probably needs root to do this though, and it would also need to implement the global shortcuts API to be able to respond to a key bind I believe.

            So perhaps a bit of column A and column B.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Here we are YEARS later and OpenBoard is STILL broken.

        No, I don’t want a fully contained, separate whiteboard application - As a teacher, I need to be able to DIRECTLY DRAW ON THE DESKTOP. Until this is a fully supported feature that software can implement, Wayland is completely broken for me.

        • Beacon@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It might be a problem of the openboard software, not a problem of wayland. I don’t know what you mean by “directly draw on the desktop”, but whatever it is have you looked for other apps that might do the same thing?

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Quite simply, you can draw and annotate the screen. I can circle things, draw attention to things, and highlight things on every window in the desktop environment without ANY consideration of what application is running - it’s completely agnostic. Wayland’s design doesn’t allow it.

            Until this feature is present, Wayland is unusable for me.

            This kind of thing is precisely why the overall decision to replace X by building something NEW was folly from the beginning - because you are ALWAYS going to be missing use cases. X should’ve been treated like an API and “completion” be measured directly and terms of how much of the functionality is implemented - not in terms of “how much, in fuzzy natural language terms, do we have that works equivalently”.

            Also, and let’s be entirely clear about this… Open Board got here FIRST. It was FINISHED software. Developed, released, and doing its job. To come along, make a change to its dependencies, and then blame IT for doing something wrong? Is it the job of every single developer to update their software to match what Wayland wants? Thousands of projects over decades? What happens when the Wayland devs make another change and something else breaks? I’m getting flashbacks of Linus Torvalds RIGHTFULLY yelling at a developer blaming an application for not functioning after a kernel update. “WE DO NOT BREAK USER SPACE.”

            Android forces developers to make these kinds of retroactive changes, and it’s why the ecosystem sucks and any stable, well-built software is a couple updates away from being useless. I don’t want my desktop OS to be more like that.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Wayland isn’t a piece of software. It is simply a set if standards apps use to talk to the desktop which then talks to the kernel and hardware.

              Apps access resources via XDG portals. If there isn’t a portal for something it needs to be implemented at the desktop.

              Back to your use case, I think you probably just need the appropriate desktop extension. Drawing on the desktop sounds like a desktop level thing.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sessions don’t resume properly after sleep. Tools like Barrier don’t fully work. Wayland is fine, but it’s just not mature.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Garbage HDR support. But I think that’s more of a KDE issue. (IDK I’m not a Linux pro)

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          17 hours ago

          x11 doesn’t support HDR at all, so even with HDR support still not being fully mature in KDE and GNOME that’s a argument for wayland.

        • murvel@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          HDR support is the whole reason for picking Wayland and anyhow I don’t see whats so bad about it.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Do you people ever think that Wayland is being sorta shoved down our throats ?

    PipeWire wasn’t

    • darksiderbun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve been waiting for Wayland to take over since like 2011 or some ancient time like that. I’m just glad it’s finally got some traction tbh.

        • darksiderbun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I am unaware of the current goings on, but tentatively yeah. Don’t force switch everyone to Wayland without taking care of accessibility features first.

  • Gnugit@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    How is wayland nvidia gaming at the moment?

    Several months ago I tried gaming on wayland with nvidia and it was completely broken for me.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Games worked for me on Kubuntu, but a lot of other things were seriously broken. Compositor/Desktop effects did not work at all, weird screen artifacts, Taskbar crashes, Discord lags terribly and has display problems. I don’t know, if that is going to be the new Desktop experience, we’re gonna have a problem.

    • disco@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Just make sure the kernel modules are enabled and so are the systemd services. Shouldn’t have a problem. It’s been butter since they released the VRR fix a few months ago

      • Gnugit@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Could you please guide me to relevant documentation for this?

        For now I’ll just start at the Arch wiki for wayland.

    • murvel@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Depends on the desktop environment in my experience. On Fedora Gnome it was an unstable mess with my Nvidia RTX card but Fedora KDE Plasma has been stable.

      • Gnugit@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It was mainly on Nobara but I guess my negative experience also followed me from troubles in debian early 2024.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’ve been gaming with a 2080ti in Wayland for about a year now. I can’t say I’ve had any issues related to my graphics card at all. The only hiccups I’ve had are with a couple of games, maybe two, that I had to tweak to run. They were known issues with public fixes. It’s been a great experience.

      There was an issue a few months back with multi monitor setups. Anytime I changed a monitor input, it would hard lock. It’s fixed now.

    • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve got an nvidia card and I’ve personally got no complaints about Wayland! been using it for some time to much success, I feel like x11 is just ‘off’ in comparison.

    • Blubber28@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It works just fine for me on my RTX 3060 Ti. No significant performance decrease or stuttering at all (except in Cities Skylines II but that’s not Wayland’s fault)

    • Hegz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Several months ago I had a similar experience. Even just running plasma with Wayland+Nvidia was enough to cause problems.