I might have to agree with that other commenter that maybe new terms are needed just for clarity of communication, at least with those outside the movement.
In my mind, personal property would be a subset of private property so getting rid of the larger set necessarily includes the subset.
So personal property as you’re using it presumably has a maximum allowable level? Or just as long as it’s for your personal use? No rental houses for example, but a vacation home would be ok?
Corporate property sounds like the problem is corporations and not ownership imo.
Either way I’m not going back to change this, it’s made, posted, and I’ve moved on but you’re welcome to modify it as you wish.
Wait, the problem you’re stating isn’t corporate ownership, but ownership in general? Then what’s the personal property?
Capitalism is defined by private ownership. Be it corporations or rich individuals, the underlying issue is the ownership.
I am not calling to abolish all concepts of ownership, only what we call ‘private property’. I am in favour of personal property.
I might have to agree with that other commenter that maybe new terms are needed just for clarity of communication, at least with those outside the movement.
In my mind, personal property would be a subset of private property so getting rid of the larger set necessarily includes the subset.
So personal property as you’re using it presumably has a maximum allowable level? Or just as long as it’s for your personal use? No rental houses for example, but a vacation home would be ok?
The toothbrush
Oh, I’m not saying you should change this post, no, of course not!
And I’m also not trying to work at cross purposes with you either, we both want the same thing, I think.
Just noting maybe a better approach that might work, for your and others’ reference, that was all.
Private property is like the goal of corporations though. The super highway to end stage capitalism.