• delgato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I endorse nuclear power and am enjoying the second look it is getting now but as a geologist I ask where the nuclear waste will go. No one ever wants to talk about it and there is really easy solution, the deep subsurface (miles below the ground). It’s safe, cheap, and Finland has shown how it’s done.

    This is part of a broader issue in preparing our next generations for jobs of the future. To build out this infrastructure you need smart technical people to make it work and ask the tough questions, but I know this administration doesn’t care about that.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The solutions exist and the USA has been aware of those solutions since they invented nuclear power in the 50’s. Unfortunately Capitalism doesn’t allow long-term planning so almost every time a long-term storage solution has been proposed, or ever funded, a few elections later it get’s defunded to the praised of misguided environmentalists and the green-washing fossil fuel lobby.

      The one I know about the most was Yucca Mountain which got defunded. But at least WiPP is back open. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant

    • Avatar of Vengeance@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Look I hear you, the way the US does nuclear power has a lot of issues, it’s really an industry that requires strong state backing like what China and Russia have going on.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    So Iran can’t but the US can? Is this plant going to be an acceptable target now that the US has entered the war?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump reduced the “red tape” to build this so it might just be dangerous on its own

      Assuming it comes online in less than a decade and not drastically over budget

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Eh, the newest generation of reactors are actually really safe. It’s been a while since I’ve read up on them, but I believe that it’s impossible for some of them to meltdown.

        The red tape for building nuclear plants was based on the first few gen reactors, and needed to be reduced.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Thoughtfully reduced and changed. I don’t trust that the red tape reduction in this case was thoughtful, though I will admit I haven’t looked myself. With all the shit being thrown at the wall it’s impossible to keep up, even though nuclear power generation is one of my areas of interest.