cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 23 hours agoAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1882cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1882imageAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 23 hours agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareblackn1ght@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up11·19 hours agoThis isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
minus-squarecopd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agobesides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
minus-squarerooroo@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoNaaah. Good programmers know how to use as any as any to make this work in typescript as well.
This isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
besides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
Naaah. Good programmers know how to use
as any as anyto make this work in typescript as well.