I was kind of trying to become an author, in my case a writer, and I spent a lot of time perfecting my style and polishing my chapters, and studying the novels I read to write well and interestingly. But a month ago I finally gave up when, after studying the material and asking other people, I realized that I had no chance.

And if there is a chance, then for a year or several to become the author of AI, and I did not want to stoop to such a level, for me it is the greatest shame and insult. Alas, soon there will be much more real art in the comments than in these generated empty shells.

Yeah, I’m damn offended, and yeah, I think I’ve made a post like this before, but now I just want to have a heart-to-heart talk, and now I’m damn hurt, and I keep writing, and I don’t even know why, but I feel like I have to.

Yes, unfortunately, in addition, I am not a native English speaker, so this post may read strangely or stupidly, alas, but I apologize.

  • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    The reality is that statistically you are more likely to win $1 million in the lottery than to become an author in the US who can live on their income from writing fiction. It does still happen but the people who’s work leads them to become full time authors are extraordinarily lucky, talented, hard working, AND again, lucky.

    So you have to write for the joy of writing and expect to have a day job. And if that writing makes money, that’s great and you should keep doing as much of it as you can. But please accept that it’s not going to be your income driver for the foreseeable future.

    • ThePunnyMan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think that’s true for the arts in general. Unless you are both extraordinary talented and are able to get lots of people to recognize that talent it’s hard to make a living in the arts. Art is a wonderful thing to be passionate about, and it is an important part of life and society despite how some people tend to downplay its value. It’s rarely stable work. There is a reason why there are tropes like the starving artist or actors waiting tables.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because of AI, I will probably never be able to make a decent living from this, or at all. Before AI, there was still some chance, but now it is simply destroyed, and it does not matter if I spend 10 years or less, my creativity will not be needed by anyone if AI does it faster, cheaper and also better.

      But your thoughts are quite relevant for the current time.

      • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        This was true even in the 90s I’m sad to say. It’s one of the reason I didn’t pursue fiction writing as a career 30 years ago. I don’t think AI will replace any working authors because poorly written slop and computer generated text are both a lot older than today’s LLMs craze.

        The field of authorship has been in a slow decline for a long, long time. It has a lot to do with the way the book Publishing industry was run in the middle and later half of the 20th century. We stopped valuing authority and authors and it became a less valuable occupation. This happened to teachers and a lot of other thought-based fields too.

        • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Oh, how damn right you are, I just remember some cult writers of the past who lived no better than ordinary workers, if not poorly on the brink of survival.

          Only in the future, thanks to these AIs, even earning a penny from writing will be a miracle even for the talented and lucky.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I don’t think that’s the case. Most people don’t want to consume AI-generated content, especially books. Pretty sure there aren’t any really popular books that are AI-generated. Just some bottom-tier slop on sites like Amazon, made to fool people into believing they’re real books. If you’re competing with those, you wouldn’t have been successful anyway. Being a successful author has always been very hard and involves a lot of luck.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well, how to say in the future no amount of effort will be enough. Only having a cult status and a niche will help, otherwise you will have to go to a regular job or even die of hunger if you have serious health problems.

      The final stage of capitalism seems to scream: make as much money as possible at any cost, no matter who suffers in the process.

  • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fuck that, write your book. I’ve never posted a picture online, but I love photography and take tons of photos. I’ve even got paid a few times (more of a tip than bill lol). If you enjoy writing, please don’t quit. And keep in mind we’re also seeing rapid decay of norms in society, you don’t know what the world looks like in 6 months, nevermind 6 years, we’ll always need artists though.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m pretty sure there’s a vast market for human made art and literature. Personally, I would never pay for AI generated slop.

    Yeah, you’re gonna lose in some markets like advertising copy and ad artwork. But who cares?

    Especially in literature, AI slop is really disliked and honestly it’s quite shit.

    Are there gonna be AI slop books in Amazon bookstores? Yeah. Will some people buy it? Yeah, unfortunately, but it’s not gonna take over the market.

    Just keep at your passions, yo. AI gen shit like that is largely a fad propped up by LLM companies saying their models can do everything when they’re really actually not very capable or interesting.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      These AIs are more likely to simply steal human labor than create something of their own, although they are not people, so there is nothing surprising about it.

      And I have another problem: my writing style is, so to speak, bloodthirsty, and the characters’ stories are cruel, I’m afraid that I will be constantly threatened with blocking if I publish this, but I don’t care, I will continue, I can’t not write.

      But reality can be merciless, as if a flood had swamped an entire city along with its inhabitants, sparing neither children nor anyone else.

      That’s why I’m afraid that capitalism can work miracles, even taking away people’s souls.

      But thank you for your comforting answer.

  • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah I’ve given up on making a living off of art. I’ve pivoted to trying to just share it for free as much as I can. Honestly I think big corporate studios would have way less of a market if community art was more of a thing. It’d be nice to have local art and culture around rather than soulless corpo slop. I think those communities would process the world in a healthier way.

    I hear you though. It really really sucks ass that literally no one (if you round) gets to make a living doing art. And (if you don’t round) those that do get to make a living on it generally come from a very small subset of the available cultures.

    This is a good thing to be mad about. It affects how everyone sees the world.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly, I wanted to make money from art so that I would have more free time to make my works as bright and high-quality as possible. Otherwise, when you come home from work, you are already such a vegetable that even writing a small bad piece of text is already a miracle.

      But the idea of ​​making art free sounds strange to me, or can you make it free and then hope for donations?

      • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Donations would be great. I dream of mine would be to get a large enough following to live a decent life off of donations and just make art. Kinda far fetched, but it would be great.

        I know one person I’ve found that did that is Chris from Airwindows. His art is a bit technical, but he makes interesting audio software and shares it all open source. I donate a bit to him.

        • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There are examples of people who have become so iconic in their own niche that after decades they have five to ten thousand dollars a month on Patreon.

          But with donations it’s very difficult, you need to create something damn unique, with your own unique voice and even humor. But yes it is possible, although because of AI this opportunity is slowly closing.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It was actually the rise of spotify and enclosure of the music listening commons that killed my desire to record and produce music.

    AI feels like the boring next step from the Spotify CEO saying musicians shouldn’t expect to be able to make a living making and recording music. It is all part of the same movement to train people to see creativity done by humans as inherently valueless and amateur so that profitable simulcrums of human creativity can take center stage that parasitically feed on unpaid artistic human labor. I don’t hate music streaming services, I hate the axiomatic assumption in my society that progress can only ever be a process of increasing austerity for artists in order to fund increasing profit for the ownership class that steals the labor of artists.

    Art is a product of a corporation in the context of a market to be evaluated by how well it attracts attention, entirely human made art is just a silly thing you occasionally do on the side as a gesture to someone you know like a handwritten note that is novel and fun precisely because it is a vanishingly rare thing. This is the suffocating environment being forced on human artists.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, this is a real classic, I think the joke here is perfect: an influential nobleman takes away the last food from a poor peasant, only in our time with a smile and justification of progress.

    • Frozentea725@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Quboz is a great alternative, high def music large catalogue and they pay the artists at least 4 x the amount per stream.