Two former Harvard students are launching a pair of “always-on” AI-powered smart glasses that listen to, record, and transcribe every conversation and then display relevant information to the wearer in real time.

“Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,” said AnhPhu Nguyen, co-founder of Halo, a startup that’s developing the technology.

Or, as his co-founder Caine Ardayfio put it, the glasses “give you infinite memory.”

“The AI listens to every conversation you have and uses that knowledge to tell you what to say … kinda like IRL Cluely,” Ardayfio told TechCrunch, referring to the startup that claims to help users “cheat” on everything from job interviews to school exams.

    • ckmnstr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In the tech bro / VC world “Harvard Dropout” equates to an MD title in a hospital. It’s instant credibility.

  • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    TLDR; Two wannabe tech bros drop out of college to make yet another pair of smart glasses that will fail because nobody wants it.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Are they trying to evoke the Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs vibe by saying Harvard dropouts? Do they not realize that those are HORRIBLE people no one should ever look up to?

  • SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Didn’t Google try this and canned the project after nobody wanted to wear them or be recorded all the time?

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    If their glasses make you “super intelligent” when you put them on, then maybe they should put on their own product and finish school? That was my line of thinking, until I got to this part of the article:

    Ardayfio called the glasses “the first real step towards vibe thinking.”

    …and then I realized I have no idea what the hell they’re talking about and stopped reading.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    LTT did a hands on with a similar product, the Frame by Brilliant Labs. It sucked.
    I do not expect this to fare any better.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wish someome would ELI5 media literacy. So if I see an article, but I can read between the lines and know what it really means, or that it is sensationalized click bait, am I media literate? Or does it mean I am aware of trackers and surveillance on everything? Does it mean I know to check international news sources to be more well rounded?

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Well, there’s https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_literacy but that’s not written for children

          I don’t think, of your examples, trackers and surveillance are a big part of it. Understanding subtext and credibility are more relevant. Like, recognizing when a newspaper always uses passive voice when cops do bad (eg: “man killed after violent police encounter” vs “police fatally shoot man waiting at bus stop”), but active voice for other people (eg: “Looters destroy small business shops” vs “Downtown shops damaged during anti-corruption protests”)

          Also in fiction, being able to take away more than just the plot. Like you can read Dracula as just a book about a guy that bites people, but there are way more ways to read it. When someone makes a movie out of the story, notice what parts they keep, emphasize, and drop.

    • root@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Black mirror is no longer sci-fi. It is slowly becoming a documentary. - Louis Rossman

    • phase@lemmy.8th.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      People missed those are warnings. They have no imagination so they took those as advices or even manuals. In a sense, they learnt.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,”

    A bit too late guys, as glasses have always made anyone look super intelligent. If that wasn’t the case, why would anyone want to wear them? Because that’s the only reason I wear mine, and certainly not because I’m as blind as a bat when I don’t.

    More seriously, their plan is to kill IRL conversations by making it impossible to trust anyone we would directly talk to?

    Impressive. Sad & frightening, but impressive.

    Also, I wonder who they will blame the moment they realize the hell they will have made of everybody’s interactions?

    edit: typos

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sucks for glasses wearers who are about to be having a lot of blurry conversations when everyone starts to tell everyone to take off their glasses before they talk.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, the first thing I imagined: how shitty would it be to not be able to see who I’m talking to… because I value my (and other’s) privacy I would ask them to not wear their glasses and would not be wearing mine ;)

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      i’m glad that my own vanity will prevent me from getting these. lol