It’s marginal gains all the way here but genuinely if you’re an omnivore the E-Bike might work out more enviromentally conscious

  • prole [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think you’ve mistaken my comments if you think I’m trying to make e-bikes sound bad or something. When I made that comment, I looked up how much a few bikes weigh and found several articles that said e-bikes typically weigh about twice as much. Obviously this isn’t applicable across the board to every bike, but there’s really no way to make that kind of comparison without using rough averages or doing way more research than I’m prepared to do.

    Again, I’m just saying if we are going to compare the emissions of e-bikes and bikes then we should make the comparison for everything. We’re already talking about a pretty small number, so even if it only requires 1.5 extra trips or whatever there would be a difference.

    Also, a container ship isn’t the only thing required to get a bike to people. Trains, trucks, and planes are used as well. If the truck going from Seattle to North Dakota or whatever has to make a second trip or 1.33 trips or whatever, that is an increase in emissions. I’m not sure why we are going back and forth on this because it seems incredibly obvious that this would have to be accounted for to make an accurate comparison.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure why we are going back and forth on this because it seems incredibly obvious that this would have to be accounted for to make an accurate comparison.

      The frame of reference here, to me at least, isn’t the utopia where we get to squabble about the ecological merits of e-bike vs. acoustic bike, it’s where one car getting shipped anywhere from anywhere eats up the logistical CO2-equivalent of about 50 bikes (55 for e-bikes).