The provisions would immediately strip Medicaid and Medicare coverage for gender-affirming care if passed by both chambers of Congress and signed into law. But their impact could stretch far beyond that narrow reading. President Trump, who has repeatedly shown a willingness to expand executive authority, could wield the language as yet another weapon in his ongoing campaign of federal funding threats. Armed with this budgetary provision, his administration could pressure hospitals and clinics—just as it has already done with youth gender care providers—by threatening to pull federal dollars unless they comply with sweeping anti-trans policies.


Importantly, the funding ban would cover all forms of gender-affirming care, including “social” or “psychological” interventions. That language sweeps far beyond medical treatment and could place adult psychological support, therapy, and counseling directly in the crosshairs, along with any federally funded effort deemed “social” in nature. In practice, “social” care often refers to basic steps like updating names in official systems, changing gender markers, or affirming identity in institutional settings. Under this provision, the Trump administration could interpret even those routine measures as violations, weaponizing the ban to choke off critical funding for any entity deemed out of compliance.

These are not the only provisions in the appropriations bill targeting transgender people. Another section stipulates that any educational institution receiving federal funding could lose that funding if it allows transgender female students to participate in “athletic programs or activities designated for women or girls.” Such language would function as a de facto national transgender sports ban, forcing schools and universities into compliance. Even more troubling, the vague use of the word “activity” could give the administration sweeping latitude to strong-arm schools into broader restrictions—potentially extending to bathrooms, dorms, and virtually any gendered program or event, even if it may not be fully supported by some readings of the text.

      • If you can scrape together 5k (selling most belongings can get a lot of people there) and plan it out there’s a lot of places you can go. Canada is pretty expensive, but there’s places where your dollar goes further and cost of living is lower. Mexico and Portugal are good choices for ease of culture shock. But if you can make it to China, life can be a bit more cushy, thought trans rights are lacking a bit there. I’m putting together a personal spreadsheet to figure out the best choice for me and my priorities.

        • BountifulEggnog [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 days ago

          I can get that together, probably even more by the time I’d be able to leave. But I have no college degree and don’t know how I’d actually get accepted anywhere. I was under the impression most countries had fairly strict requirements for immigration.

          • You need to search out the visa process for places you’re interested in. Portugal is one that’s pretty easy. Also, you can over stay your visa in most of the world and they don’t hunt you for sport. A lot of other countries have cheap or free college too. Most of these things are just jumping through some hoops and doing the right paperwork - assume that if you have the will, there’s a way to get it done. The US bricks our brains to believe that you have to stay in a box and there’s no other boxes or anything outside the box. Third world country in a Gucci belt.