• SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought invasive implied a species was moved by another. I don’t think a species can be invasive just for moving north or something. Humans moved themselves gradually over time.

    • optissima@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A quick search defines invasive species as a type of introduced species, which is outlined as

      An introduced species, alien species, exotic species, adventive species, immigrant species, foreign species, non-indigenous species, or non-native species is a species living outside its native distributional range, but which has arrived there by human activity, directly or indirectly, and either deliberately or accidentally.

      So I’d say that technically they are, but even more to the point it seems like the invasive species definition is very human centric (an alien cannot create an invasive species?)

      • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Obviously this is a super semantically oriented discussion but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say human in this context really refers more to the role. Humans can control other species in that way, like an extra terrestrial also likely could have.

        I’m not saying I agree with the idea, I’m just looking for a way humans could be “invasive”

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They adapted the definition to include causing economic or environmental harm because NERDS kept pointing out that all species are either constantly invading new territory or in the process of going extinct.