fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoIF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1604
arrow-up1604imageIF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThat’s so many nested assumptions, lol: Assumption table Graduate student in academia Running a simulation for data For a conference Haskell The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0% Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 month agoCome on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
minus-squaremuzzle@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month ago Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoOur telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
minus-squareLH0ezVT@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoYeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
minus-squareSupervisor194@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month ago Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-230 days agoI know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.
That’s so many nested assumptions, lol:
Assumption table
The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0%
Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
Come on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
deleted by creator
Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
Our telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
Yeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
I know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.