Why do you comment something without reading the article? This is a quote from someone explaining what they saw, not the reporter describing her like that.
I thought that it was a bit odd wording too based on the quote alone, implying that Greta was some fragile small thing everyone should protect instead of brave young woman that she is. But then I read the article and in context it makes sense, that’s something I might say too in the same situation.
Well that would likely be even more biased. Yes, it would be good to get a statement from Israel. But just because we can’t get unbiased info doesn’t mean we should believe everything.
Why do you comment something without reading the article? This is a quote from someone explaining what they saw, not the reporter describing her like that.
I thought that it was a bit odd wording too based on the quote alone, implying that Greta was some fragile small thing everyone should protect instead of brave young woman that she is. But then I read the article and in context it makes sense, that’s something I might say too in the same situation.
Of course. And that’s the main source the reporter is using, so it’s relevant.
What other source did you want? IDF soldiers explaining how they did nothing to her at all and she deserved every bit of it.
Well that would likely be even more biased. Yes, it would be good to get a statement from Israel. But just because we can’t get unbiased info doesn’t mean we should believe everything.