• BeanisBrain [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    The only real answer might be to put more people to work in the agricultural sector to do the same amount of work, letting everyone have shorter shifts (will never happen under capitalism, of course).

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Revenue sharing paid out to the workers by the hours they work might be acceptible.

      Paying a person by the number of bins they fill in a day creates a situation were every worker is in direct competition with each other seems… not great in the long term for the harvest workers in general.

      A single person being able to fill 15 bins in a day might not want to lose pay by only filling 10/11/12 bins and leaving the other apples for other workers. Other workers are then cut out of being able to make as much as there are less apples for them to pick. Feedback loop kicks in where new apple pickers can’t “get gud” fast enough to poach apples from that one asshole who can pick 15 bins worth in a day so fewer and fewer people can view this seasonal work as actually worth while.

      Capitalism is a shit.

        • wrecker_vs_dracula [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I couldn’t have said it better myself. All attempts so far at automating apple picking for the grocery market have failed. Probably the biggest recent advancement is having pickers stand on tiered platforms that get slowly pulled along by a small tractor. The hottest new tech is using a vacuum system and a rotary airlock valve to eliminate workers’ time spent dumping bags into bins. It’s still all about having people grab the fruit off the tree in even the very highest of high tech operations.