• cecilkorik@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They are not logically incompatible, but we will have to make clear and specific decisions about where one ends and the other begins.

    Unless you are asking me to live in a society where I must share my toothbrush with others because I am not allowed to keep any private property.

    I do believe in private property: with modest, reasonable limits. Which we can and will discuss the details of over time, and I understand that will likely become a heated discussion at times, but I believe it is an inevitable and necessary one. Does that disqualify me from being a leftist? Does it make me a liberal too? Let me know.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      Private property in this context means things which generate/are used to generate capital, not just any kind of object which people might have and use. The important distinction is that capital is social, it is a means of coercing others to do work for you. That’s true for a factory, where people work for the owner, or for a rented property where the tenant must work to pay the owner. It’s true in a way even for wages - when you spend money you are buying the products of people’s labour (which under capitalism was not produced in a just way). It’s not the case for your toothbrush.

      The distinction that liberalism made was that everyone should in theory be allowed to own private property rather than royals appointed by divine right and hereditary nobility they delegated some power to. Not that in the 1700s we were suddenly allowed to have our own clothes for the first time in history.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 seconds ago

        It’s not the case for your toothbrush.

        Isn’t it though? I didn’t make my toothbrush. It came from the toothbrush factory. In fact, it’s an electric toothbrush. Which presumably requires a lot of somewhat high tech inputs and resources to create. Would someone have developed this innovation without some economic pressure to do so? I’m not totally convinced. I think there is some role for capital in that sense. Maybe I’m wrong.

        Thank you for taking my somewhat tongue in cheek comment so generously though. My humor is not always placed appropriately and doesn’t always come across well, but it sometimes provokes people to respond, and I’m simply trying to learn and keep an open mind, and I appreciate your time and effort in sharing your knowledge.