• Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      This argument probably sounds really good if you completely disregard the past 300 or so years of Canadian-Indigenous relations.

        • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          “Indigenous people fought each other and did bad things, therefore committing a genocide is OK.”

          What a lovely & compelling argument.

          Also, sorry for assuming you’d be able to recognize that “Canadian” included the history of British and French colonists in what became Canada.

            • redwhacker@social.trom.tf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              @Evkob @nutpantz

              Genocide is legally defined as any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group: killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children to another group. This definition is established by the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention.

              Do you deny any of these acts occurred upon the indigenous people of these territories now named Canada by European settlers and their descendants?