Something that you can actually remember

  • Moidialectica [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Memorisation, keep it written someone, check it each time you want to write it, you eventually memorize it

    Creating patterns, make abstract rules that only you will remember, make passwords with that in mind (for example, left three keys of your keyboard is a numpad and every fourth letter is capitalized)

    Plagiarism, just use the product codes of some random item lying around, they’re long and random enough to be a good password

  • ashenone@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I use the so obvious it surely can’t be method. I’ve used hunter2 for at least a decade now and have never been had

      • CarbonConscious [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ya know that’s what they say, but I’m not so sure - is your dictionary-based brute-forcer doing strings of three words together? Allowing for interspersed special characters between? The sheer character length of three truly random dictionary words in a row is already staggeringly high amounts of entropy - I’m not sure I need to be worried about an attacker capable of that kind of sheer number-buggery.

        • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s about combinatorics.

          On your bikelock you have a 3 character code with and alphabet of 0-9. So 10^3 = 1000 possible combinations.

          If you pick 3 random words out of a dictionary with 40k words, there are 40000^3 possible combinations. (64 000 000 000 000).

          Depending on how the password is hashed a 1000$ machine might be able to test anywhere from like 10 to 10 000 000 000 000 hashes per second. (100 billion hashes per second are more realistic)

          So a 3 word password might be safe for a very very long time or cracked in seconds.

          A 4 word password will take 40000 times as long.

        • KnilAdlez [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m sure they are ever since this comic came out. It is a very large amount of entropy, but it is still far, far less than an equivalent amount of random characters. Honestly, you do you. If passwords are properly hashed and password attempts are not unlimited and as fast as possible, you’re basically fine.

        • LangleyDominos [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          If it’s three words together, they can’t really verify one word by itself. That’s why it’s secure. They would have to test all combinations of three words which would take forever. The reason dictionary attacks work is because people use one word (password), a simple modification of a word (password1!), or a simple common phrase (openssesame1!). The technique is just hoping someone was being ignorant or negligent. But you’re right, they would have to crack all three words in sequence, which means testing all combinations of three words. That’s hard to do.

          This is why social engineering is much more important. To even get close to cracking all three words they would have to get to know you, assuming you’re using something related to yourself like a relative’s name, your favorite movie, an inside joke between friends. A targeted attack against you will probably start with social engineering rather than brute forcing your passwords. A random attack is like people who walk down the street looking for an unlocked car door. They’re just trying to find someone who isn’t secure, not you specifically, and therefore probably wouldn’t start with getting to know you.

          You want your dictionary to be as small as possible. You can scrape Oxford to a text file and use that, but you’re wasting so much time on thousands of words that are unlikely to be relevant. So rather than just using random words they use common words, phrases, and variations of those in their dictionaries. An actual dictionary probably wouldn’t contain correct, horse, battery, or staple. It’s more likely to be password, password1, password2, etc and then the other common stuff people use for passwords. If you’re a targeting someone specific, you would make a custom dictionary specific to their life.

          • CarbonConscious [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Good info! And that’s exactly what I meant - a word is weak, but several randomized words together is pretty crazy strong. Slightly less than random letters, but much easier to type in memorize when the situation calls for it.

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        even 4 words with one common substitution fucks up dictionary attack, cause you expand the search space 3-10 fold per word. although one have to have at least one relatively uncommon word (from 20k vocabulary, not 2k vocabulary)

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Congratulations, everyone who didn’t say “password manager” just cut down the search space to crack their hexbear.net account password by a huge amount.

    • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is a nonsensical criticism. A password of six random words has 2^77 possibilities. This means, even if they knew you were using this method, then with state of the art computing, we’re talking like the age of the universe to crack one. If they didn’t know, then we’re talking like 10^70 times that. A password of just a few words would be more than secure enough.

      Search space for cracking passwords, if Hexbear.net is doing any sort of half-decent hashing method, isn’t a very big deal beyond having more than like, 8 characters. If anything, having a common attack vector like a password manager could mean you’re even more likely to be done in.

      In a previous life I did a lot of MD5 password cracking, the problem has since been all but solved.

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I admit it was a snarky joke from me, and more trying to be provocative about building a security culture than a proper criticism. You’re correct.

        (Neat to hear you’ve done some hash cracking in the past!)

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I took a long phrase I’m familiar with, peppered it with special characters and used it as the password for a Keepass database, that way I only have to remember one. That DB is synced between my devices with Syncthing. If you’re tech savvy enough to use Lemmy I’d wager you’re tech savvy enough to set that up.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Use KeePass XC. Come up with a unique but hard to crack master password as others have shared and which you never use for anything else other than KeePass.

    Then KeePass lets you generate random password strings with settings for changing the kinds of included characters, the password length, uppercase or lowercase, etc.

  • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use a password manager. Most of them have a built in generator that allows you to specify length, type of characters, etc…

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I preface this by saying im a tech barbarian and shouldnt be relied on as a reliable source of info on tech topics.

    The only bit of advice I remember on password security comes from someone critiquing snowden’s suggestion in some interview where he said the best kind of passwords are pass-phrases like “MargaretThatcheris110%sexy” or some shit and basically said

    “MergaretThatcher+is110%PiSSTA” is a whole lot better because it adds more randomness to the mix and makes it harder for the cumputer demons to crack your tough nut of a password open to feast upon its tender innards.

  • I ask my password manager to come up with something. I only have a small number of passwords I actually know, the rest are stored in keepass. I used keepass to come up with my keepass passphrase and the handful of other passwords that I keep in my head.

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t use passwords that are possible to remember, I use a password manager instead. That’s both easier and more secure at the same time, a hard to beat combo.

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    One thing I find useful with regards to special character requirements: it’s hard to remember a string of special characters, it’s easy to remember a number sequence with the shift key held down.