I literally dont know because Zionism is so deeply embedded everywhere.
I know for me I have worked with Zionists and Nazis and I have no choice in the matter. I could never say “I won’t work with Zionists or Nazis”.
I think there is selection pressure that those people move up in ranks. so if you are looking at the pool of available people to hire for a senior position, are there enough candidates who are able willing and available to fill the jobs? Knowing that they might personally get a lot of backlash for even taking the job under that circumstance. Need to be both competent and brave.
If there are, then doesn’t it make sense to say “I’ll consider everyone” then just fill the positions with your people anyway?
And fr look how hard it is for a site like hexbear to find mods who never ever do anything that could be understood as Zionist. Making a statement that would leave his administration open to permanent struggle sessions seems like a bad idea.
He could also just not comment either way. If he said this same statement but he said “don’t worry, there will be klansmen in my administration” the reaction shouldn’t be “well of course, it would require a draconian level of oversight to enforce the alternative” the reaction should be “why tf are you saying that?”
Making a statement that would leave his administration open to permanent struggle sessions seems like a bad idea.
Then avoid the question, or say anything other than “I will hire nazis knowingly”. Just say “some of the people I hire might be nazis, I’m not giving everyone a political quiz” if you absolutely have to.
I don’t follow beat by beat but I think its been understood for a long time that he’s gonna have brad lander in there. And he has affirmed Zionism. This was all since before the primary even happened so there is no news.
I agree it would be better to have developed one of the smart ass deflections people find so cute. Maybe he reached the limit if his charm.
So you think it would be possible?
I literally dont know because Zionism is so deeply embedded everywhere.
I know for me I have worked with Zionists and Nazis and I have no choice in the matter. I could never say “I won’t work with Zionists or Nazis”.
I think there is selection pressure that those people move up in ranks. so if you are looking at the pool of available people to hire for a senior position, are there enough candidates who are able willing and available to fill the jobs? Knowing that they might personally get a lot of backlash for even taking the job under that circumstance. Need to be both competent and brave.
If there are, then doesn’t it make sense to say “I’ll consider everyone” then just fill the positions with your people anyway?
And fr look how hard it is for a site like hexbear to find mods who never ever do anything that could be understood as Zionist. Making a statement that would leave his administration open to permanent struggle sessions seems like a bad idea.
He could also just not comment either way. If he said this same statement but he said “don’t worry, there will be klansmen in my administration” the reaction shouldn’t be “well of course, it would require a draconian level of oversight to enforce the alternative” the reaction should be “why tf are you saying that?”
Then avoid the question, or say anything other than “I will hire nazis knowingly”. Just say “some of the people I hire might be nazis, I’m not giving everyone a political quiz” if you absolutely have to.
This is an unforced error.
I don’t follow beat by beat but I think its been understood for a long time that he’s gonna have brad lander in there. And he has affirmed Zionism. This was all since before the primary even happened so there is no news.
I agree it would be better to have developed one of the smart ass deflections people find so cute. Maybe he reached the limit if his charm.