• 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean, I own a snow shovel but I have no way to prove it because I’m not at home and I don’t have a photo of it.

      I’m not saying blockchain is amazing, and I don’t even think we’ll put it to any good use (I mean it’s been years), but the concept of property can be nebulous.

      • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was just talking shit about NFTs since they are specifically non-fungible. I have a dim view of them, and have yet to see a use case that couldn’t be done more elegantly through account ownership, like owning a game on Steam for example. I know proponents like to argue that they own their token, and I don’t own my games, but I feel like enacting laws over software ownership can fix that, where NFTs are fundamentally valueless without a company providing value. Like the Nascar mobile game NFTs that became worthless once the game was canceled. I own the token for a virtual car, but it now does nothing and has no value. And I wouldn’t mind that, except for the fact that the lock chain is inherently resource intensive, so we wasted a lot of electricity and clean water to prove someone has a now useless Dale Earnhardt.

        • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, I don’t think having something in your steam library counts as owning it either, needs to be totally DRM-free and available if you or Steam is offline.

          Agreed on the account ownership though, just a straightforward system that NFTs overcomplicate.

        • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          NFTs are useful in cases far removed from owning a jpeg. Things like supply chain, where each item is tied to an NFT, akin to a tracking number. You now have an immutable history of when and where each item is along every step of the supply chain

          • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            But again, the computer that would go into that kind of a system is astronomical per item. It just doesn’t make sense to use.

            • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Only if you’re talking about a Bitcoin-style public ledger blockchain. The auditable, immutable history can also make sense in a private blockchain that costs next to nothing to add to, can be backed up for a song, and can only be added to if you hold the private key.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well then go home, get your camera and your token, and show it to us. We can wait.