I don’t think that’s a productive method of discussion. Why attack them as a person instead of pointing out the aspects of history you think contradict them?
In my opinion, RHEL did play an important part in enterprise adoption of Linux, although I think they’re heavily overplaying that
I don’t think that’s a productive method of discussion. Why attack them as a person instead of pointing out the aspects of history you think contradict them?
In my opinion, RHEL did play an important part in enterprise adoption of Linux, although I think they’re heavily overplaying that