• Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I mean are we really gonna drag this guy down with all the others because he is a proponent for copyright laws. That’s not even bad it’s the most luke warm take ever.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      At the very least, him supporting copyright is as shitty as serving meat at a climate conference.

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When your work has influence the course of pretty much all music that came after it I can absolutely understand wanting to at least maintain a semblance of control of your actual work.

      I think there are a lot of problems with copyright law but I don’t have issue with an artist maintaining control over their own work while they’re alive.

      Corporations in the other hand…

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        control over your own work

        He can still control his hands, can’t he? He can still decide whether he goes on stage?

        How is it his work if someone else learns to perform a song he wrote? How is it controlling his work to say someone can’t copy a recording of someone else playing that song?

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          You realize that those rules also protect a lesser known artist getting their work stolen from a far more influential artist too right? It’s generally a good thing that a super successful artist can’t just copy a lesser known song and reap the benefits for it.