My initial thought is definitely yes for the Steam Machine, and maybe yes for the Steam Frame.

All devices are Valve made hardware running steamOS, so I would think a lot of the discussions/content would apply to Steam Deck. This also isn’t a super busy community, so I wouldn’t be that worried about Steam Deck specific content getting buried.

The Steam Frame is a bit more iffy than the Steam Machine though, there’s a lot of experience differences between the Deck/Machine and a VR device, so there will be larger differences. Also the Frame has ARM hardware and has to use an additional x86 to ARM compatibility layer for games running on it, so we’ll probably see some unique compatibility bugs for it.

Overall though I just want to hear everyone else’s opinions on it.

  • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    I can’t wait for the steam frame. I own a second hand meta quest 2 but never installed the software on PC and I never bought a gape on it since it is facebook. But a Linux VR headset, that amazing !

  • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yes, Assuming that renaming a community without creating a new one isn’t possible.

    The best way would be to just rename to “steamhardware”, but losing everyone in the process is certainly not worth the rename for clarity.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes; it makes no sense to have multiple communities when the Steam Machine and Steam Frame are so similar to the Steam Deck. It may be that in the future it makes sense to split out topics if their isn’t overlap, but I’d say the community isn’t flooded with content and there is a lot of overlap between these topics that will benefit everyone.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yes. Anything to grow communities. The fediverse is not in the restrictive limiting of communities time in its evolution. The fediverse is in the we need more numbers phase. You need a lot more people to be worried about this kind of thing. Right now you just need more people making more post and making more comments.

  • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Absolutely. I would rather have one great community instead of 3 hyper specific communities. It just needs to have flags like [steamdeck] [ steammachine] [steamframe] Or even shorthand sd, sm, sf.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Personally, I like the idea of becoming more of a “Steam Hardwares” community, as them being all kinda niche but close in scope, they shouldn’t conflict with each other nor turn the community into a too generalist one.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, community being split up might just lead to inactivity for certain hardware if it isn’t popular enough. There’s enough overlap with SteamOS that I think being all in one is the best route. Maybe if lemmy gets way more users in the future then splitting up discussion to dedicated hardware communities might be an option, but for now better to be one.

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I wouldn’t be opposed. New community name could be SteamHardware. They share an OS and ecosystem and people interested in one would likely be interested in the others.

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Agreed, the fediverse is small enough now that living aggregate communities are preferable to dead specific ones. Especially because everyone hates posting something, getting their post removed and being told to go post in another very similar community they didn’t know existed. As you said, if it becomes a problem you can just spin off

      • Auster@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The problem can also be a positive, so that communities for more specific niches can be created, or to have alternatives for already existing ones with different management philosophies.

        • AngryMob
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          User numbers are still far too low for this to be a practical positive imo.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d love to see them included, honestly. it seems they’re all part of the same family.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Is… is it even possible to rename a community?

    Valve Ecosystem Nerds?

    Or do you just have to make a new one, and tell everyone to migrate?

    Anyway, yes, I think that untill or unless it becomes truly problematic in some way, yeah, this basically already is a comm of general Valve/Steam related both hardware and software nerd#, why be too picky?

    If a flood or trickle of noobies ever show up, easier for them to ask questions and get news in one place.

    But I also do see a potential problem of people having no idea this comm would cover more than just the Deck, not finding it in searches.

    … Not sure what to do about that?

    EDIT

    Aha!

    New comm name: Steam Dorks.

    Yep.

    Nailed it.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Definitely yes, they all run Steam OS and all 3 device are very interchangeable in what they offer. Plus there’s not that much people to properly support 3 different communities.