🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 个月前Anon sees through the liessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1587
arrow-up1587imageAnon sees through the liessh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 个月前message-square111fedilink
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前It’s basic homeostasis, homie!
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前I dont follow… How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前I just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Na pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前I imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.
You only ever need 3 whys
Why?
It’s basic homeostasis, homie!
I dont follow…
How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
I just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
Why?
(Embrace the whyception)
Na pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
Why?
I imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.