A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is from this article, of protestors in Mexico tearing down a steel fence.


While military, economic, and covert pressure on Venezuela and nearby countries in South America proper continues to mount, a similar process is occurring against Mexico, currently under the leadership of the very popular Sheinbaum, who has generally followed the footsteps of AMLO in terms of policies.

While figures in the Trump administration have made statements to the effect of wishing to bomb Mexican territory, internal pressure within Mexico is rather hard to generate when the government is doing generally positive things for people. As such, protests - comically denoted “Gen Z protests” despite young people being a vanishingly small proportion - have arisen in Mexico, very obviously astroturfed by pro-US and anti-Sheinbaum interests. The first protest, on November 15th, gathered less than 20,000 people, while the second, on November 20th, gathered perhaps 200. Article headlines suggesting that Mexico was “on the verge of collapse” have proven rather sensational and wishcast-y.

While it’s easy to poke fun at these farces (I certainly am), it’s important to keep in mind that soft coups have long been part of the American strategy in Latin America, and with unlimited money and many resources to throw at a project, even incompetent forces can eventually create enough chaos that it can make the ruling president or party feel forced to resign. Such eventualities are certainly not inevitable, and even weak states can provide enough resistance to force the US to try a hard coup instead, with outright bombing campaigns and covert military operations. Cuba has provided perhaps the best example in the western hemisphere of how such plots can be subverted with enough national support (e.g. the hundreds of times the CIA tried to kill/maim Castro, plus the Bay of Pigs debacle), but you do have to be willing to take extraordinary measures to do this - the sorts of measures figures like Chile’s Allende did not take in the 1970s, and the measures Venezuela’s Maduro appears to be taking right now. We shall see what path Sheinbaum takes.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    some maybe kind of chud-adjacent arguments incoming here, I’m not American so I dunno if the “working poor anger isn’t actually based in racism” really holds up

    but “eviction, bankruptcy, or default are death penalties in the financial system” at least is a pretty good line, so I guess even finance-bro chuds might be closer to grasping the concept of social murder than libs

    more

    When you establish that $136,500 is the real break-even point for an American family, you start to explain the rage you see in the American electorate—especially the animosity the “working poor” (really, the middle class) feel toward the “actual poor” and immigrants. Our entire safety net is designed to catch people at the very bottom, but it sets a trap for anyone trying to climb out. As income rises from $40,000 to $100,000, benefits disappear faster than wages increase. I call this zone the Valley of Death. At $35,000, a family gets SNAP food benefits and childcare subsidies. But move to just $45,000, and the family loses Medicaid eligibility. Now there are premiums and deductibles. For a family in New Jersey, the $10,000 gain is erased by an increase of $10,567 in costs. At $65,000, there is another cliff where childcare subsidies vanish. The $20,000 income gain is accompanied by $28,000 in new tuition payments. A family earning $100,000 is effectively in a worse monthly financial position than a family earning $40,000. At $40,000, you are drowning, but the state gives you a life vest. At $100,000, you are drowning, but the state says you are a “high earner” and ties an anchor to your ankle called “market price.”

    An income of $140,000 provides a bare buffer against slipping into this Valley of Death, in which every dollar in income means the disappearance of nearly as much in benefits. And at the bottom of this valley lies ruin. Eviction, bankruptcy, or default are death penalties in the financial system. They leave you barred from the credit system (often for 7–10 years), barred from the prime rental market by landlord screens, and barred from employment in sensitive sectors. During the Covid lockdowns, the costs of participating in the economy were suspended while government transfers replaced or even increased income for those at the lower income scale. Childcare ($32,000), commuting ($15,000), and work lunches ($5,000) disappeared, and families earning $80,000 actually felt comparatively rich. Then it all came back, with the costs inflated. The rage we feel today is the hangover from that brief moment. Economists and politicians look at this anger and call it racism, or lack of empathy. They are missing the mechanism. The anger at the benefits given to the poor—the EBT card, healthcare, childcare subsidies—comes from seeing that people are getting for free the exact things that they are working 60 hours a week to barely afford. And these are just the bare costs of participation. The anger isn’t about the goods. It’s about the breach of contract. The American Deal was that effort = security. Effort brought your hope strike closer. But because the real poverty line is $140,000, effort no longer yields security or progress; it brings risk, exhaustion, and debt.

    When you are drowning, and you see the lifeguard throw a life vest to the person treading water next to you—a person who isn’t swimming as hard as you are—you don’t feel happiness for them. You feel a homicidal rage at the lifeguard. We have created a system where the only way to survive is to be destitute enough to qualify for aid, or rich enough to ignore the cost. The Census Bureau tells us that the American upper class is ever-growing. Economists look at the federal government and cheer. “Look!” they say. “In 1967, only 5 percent of families made over $150,000 (adjusted for inflation). Now, 34 percent do! We are a nation of rising aristocrats.” Except that $150,000 line isn’t really the “upper class” line. It’s the survival line. About 34 percent of Americans, or a little more, have managed to escape deprivation. And the 45 percent of the country that the government and economists tell us makes up that middle class are the real working poor. These are the families earning enough to lose their benefits but not enough to pay for childcare and rent. They are the ones trapped in the Valley of Death.

    “Poverty” has collapsed to 11 percent. All the anti-poverty policies of the last decades have worked as intended. But remember Mollie Orshansky. The poverty line doesn’t measure poverty. What it measures is the percentage of Americans who cannot afford a minimum food diet multiplied by three. That’s it. It’s not measuring who can afford rent. It’s not measuring who can afford childcare. It’s measuring starvation. Of course that line is going down. We are an agricultural superpower who opened our markets to even cheaper foreign food. Food is cheap. But life is expensive. The numbers on the cost of living above—that number of around $140,000? It shows you the costs of participating in our economy. The gap between that threshold and the nominal poverty line is the Valley of Death that most American families are struggling to dig themselves out of in a system designed to prevent them from escaping. And those falling poverty numbers that economists and bureaucrats gaslight you with? Those numbers are not evidence that the system is working. They are evidence that it is failing—and that economists and politicians simply refuse to admit it.

    • ThanksObama5223 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Super interesting. As a finance person, this speaks to me. So much of the finance pedagogy in american universities is predicated on outdated metrics or oversimplified assumptions about economics. studying finance in university is a radicalizing experience, provided you have a modicum of class consciousness or even a rudimentary understanding of history/anthropology. I vividly remember the kayfabe breaking for me in a 100-level course when the myth of barter was being peddled as mere fact. The extent to which the “business schools” are separated from the humanities is intentional and serves to further ossify conventional “business” wisdom.

      I met so many well-meaning “smart” people that I’m sure have gone on to successful careers in high finance making lots of money believing all this BS to be settled fact.