Today, family separations are back, only now they are happening all across the country. The lawsuit against the zero tolerance policy resulted in a 2023 settlement that limits separations at the border, but it does not address those that occur inside the country after encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. Advocates fear the administration is conducting the new separations for the same reasons as before: to deter new immigrants from coming and to terrify those who are here into leaving.
But in a majority of the cases we examined, kids ended up in shelters in ways government officials say they never would have in the past: after routine immigration court hearings or appointments, or because they were at a home or a business when immigration authorities showed up to arrest someone else.
Carlos was first taken across the state to the Broward Transitional Center, a for-profit detention facility operated by the GEO Group, an ICE contractor. He was transferred later in the day to an Office of Refugee Resettlement shelter in Tampa run by Urban Strategies, another government contractor, records show. The GEO Group declined to comment and referred ProPublica to ICE. Lisa Cummins, president of Urban Strategies, wrote in an email: “We remain deeply committed to the care and well-being of the children we serve.”
It cracks me up on how other presidents got slack for things like family separation when it was unintended and sorta a system effect (granted some were in terms of corrections to the system to spur improvements) as compared to this outright intending to have the effect. Actively working to this end.
Oh, those other administrations were absolutely intentional. They were just smart enough to ensure plausible deniability and not gloat about it like the current Idiocracy.
What I want to know is, how bad are these shelters? Are they being sent to labor camps, murdered or what?
This month, attorneys suing the government over its treatment of children in the shelter system recovered a government document being provided to unaccompanied minors who cross the border.
What I want to know is can they account for them all, regardless of the conditions? I bet they can’t.
