Per the article, this lady is nothing more than a tepid democrat. She isn’t promising more than what democrats outside the DSA are also already saying. The only promising thing here is that the aesthetic of radicalism is getting more popular, but the context she exists in is one that’s ready to coopt that aesthetic and turn it into an empty shell if it isn’t already one. We kinda need these people to be accountable to a democratic centralist party that has a lot more stringent of a political line than the DSA.