A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Rixi Moncada of the LIBRE Party voting in the election.


On November 30th, Hondurans voted to choose their next President, as well as deputies to the Congress, councillors, and other candidates. Like all elections in Latin America, the looming shadow of American intervention will be a major factor in deciding the winner. In this election, that intervention has been fairly naked, with Trump literally stating who he wishes to win (the far-right nationalist guy, Nasry Asfura). Asfura has said that if he does not win, American funding to the country will dry up - a clear threat - and Trump has additionally pardoned the former Honduran president and US ally Juan Orlando Hernández, imprisoned for smuggling cocaine into the US.

The other candidates in this election are Salvador Nasralla of the Liberal Party, who is essentially running on the same platform as Asfura with some differences (such differences would inevitably vanish if he were to win); and Rixi Moncada of the progressive (self-described as democratic socialist) LIBRE Party. The narrative about this election is - try not to yawn - the neverending battle of democracy against communism. This narrative is obviously very important to uphold in the current environment of accelerated aggression against Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, and others.

Who is going to win? As of me writing this sentence, the results have not yet been fully reported. However, there has been something of a scandal in regards to a plot - with recorded voices, though those guilty plead AI tampering - to show the best possible preliminary results for the right wing, so as to manipulate the narrative and morale of the population. The idea, is presumably, that if LIBRE were to win, the fascists could say “How did LIBRE go from 20% of the vote (which is what the preliminary results showed) to a victory?! It must be communist meddling!”

Of course, it’s entirely possible that LIBRE won’t win anyway, or get particularly close. We shall see how things turn out very shortly.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    U.S.-Backed Forces Are Carrying Out an Electoral Coup in Honduras - Telesur English

    Article

    Rixi Moncada denounces media manipulation and narco-political financing behind the ongoing fraud. In an interview with teleSUR, Rixi Moncada, the candidate of the Libre Party and a member of the progressive project led by President Xiomara Castro, described in detail the technical irregularities, media manipulation and external interference in the presidential elections held in Honduras, where transnational right-wing forces are orchestrating an unprecedented fraud in recent Latin American history.

    During the conversation, she told journalist Jorge Gestoso that Honduras is undergoing “an electoral coup” designed to preserve a U.S.-backed oligarchic and narco-political power structure.

    GESTOSO: You said, “I reiterate my denunciation of foreign interference in the electoral process by U.S. President Donald Trump. With his interference and his pardon of Juan Orlando Hernandez, the desperate bipartisan establishment is imposing an electoral coup against me.” Is this an electoral coup?

    MONCADA: This has been completely an electoral coup. An electoral coup that is underway. Three direct messages from the U.S. president, practically against me and my platform. But with an additional component: releasing former President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who was sentenced by U.S. courts to 45 years in prison for trafficking more than 400 tons of cocaine to the U.S., in the middle of general elections to define a new government. It is an ongoing electoral coup.

    GESTOSO: You have also said that “the elections are not yet lost,” that “the bipartisan establishment did not impose its electoral scheme,” and that there is “a trap in the vote transmission system.” You even describe it as a “sinister plan by the bipartisan system.” The question is: Didn’t you see this coming?

    MONCADA: Of course we saw it coming, and it was reported. Remember that Honduras began rebuilding its institutions after the U.S.-backed coup d’etat in 2009. We have a whole history of violent coups. A president was ousted in 2009 by force of arms. There was foreign participation. And now, this electoral coup in progress. Of course we saw it coming, and it was reported at the time.

    I reaffirm that I do not accept the vote-transmission system because it is a rigged and compromised. It contains internal mechanisms preventing a transparent and democratic election.

    And if we add that interference—violating all international protocols, all international law, the OAS Democratic Charter, agreements signed by states to respect principles—using social media platforms to send three messages, with the U.S. president saying “Do not vote for candidate Moncada, I cannot work with her, she is a communist,” that is direct, brutal interference that harms the interests of the Honduran people.

    GESTOSO: You also said, “Let us remain standing and fighting until the final count; the elections are not lost.” And from there comes the question: When all ballots have been counted, are you willing to accept the result?

    MONCADA: I am always willing to respect the Honduran people’s will. But when we have a transmission system through which results from each polling station are sent, and we learn that on election night more than 3,300 presidential-level tally sheets with vote results were stuck in the system and were never published… and then a preliminary result is announced.

    We also learned that thousands of tally sheets did not go through the biometric fingerprint identity-verification system. That decision was made by the bipartisan establishment inside the National Electoral Council (CNE).

    So there is no doubt about these strategies in the transmission system that amount to real adulteration or a trap in counting the popular will. That is why I stand firm and continue the fight alongside the people who went to the polls to vote for me.

    So, I will accept the results that appear in 100% of the tally sheets we receive through our party’s system, once they are verified against the data held by the National Electoral Council. That transmission system has no credibility at any of the three electoral levels.

    GESTOSO: A relevant fact: On the night of the election, an exit poll was published placing you in first place with 37%, followed by your rival with 32%, Nasralla, and candidate Nasry Asfura with 26%. However, the first official preliminary results did not match. How did you react?

    MONCADA: The impact is more than that. Throughout November, we maintained our lead in various polls. But 82 hours before the elections, Trump issued his first message: “She is a communist, do not vote for her.” And he did not come alone.

    He was accompanied by millions of messages sent to Honduran phones saying, “If Rixi Moncada wins, December remittances will not arrive.” Honduras has approximately 2.5 million people who receive remittances from the United States. That is extortion, coercion, blackmail.

    In my view, it is an interference mechanism being tested in Honduras to see what results it yields, especially with elections upcoming in Chile and Colombia. Never before has interference of this magnitude been seen.

    So I am not only facing two candidates, I am facing the oligarchy. My proposal to democratize the economy, make everyone pay taxes, and end privileges enjoyed by a small group of powerful actors in this country—this is not only about me; bringing benefits to social sectors deeply affected especially since the coup—this is not just about the two candidates. I faced the oligarchy and interference by the U.S. establishment.

    GESTOSO: You have also said that this campaign was financed by drug trafficking, referring to the bipartisan establishment.

    MONCADA: Without any doubt. There is overwhelming evidence: more than 50 politicians, businesspeople and legislators from the bipartisan establishment have been convicted in the United States, including former President Juan Orlando Hernandez.

    And now, in the middle of an election, Trump grants a pardon to someone sentenced to 45 years. How can a judicial ruling against a drug lord accused of bringing more than 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S. be overturned, granting him a pardon during an election? That has nothing to do with justice, democracy, or the fight against drug trafficking. It is politics of interests, nothing more.

    GESTOSO: Do you believe this election has been a struggle between drug-trafficking groups?

    MONCADA: There is drug-trafficking financing. We have had it in the past and we have evidence. Entire municipalities were financed with narco money. The bipartisan establishment governed for 12 years and 7 months with explicit U.S. tolerance. Washington knew it was a mafia connected to cartels. The very day Xiomara Castro assumed the presidency, the United States presented charges against Juan Orlando Hernandez. Five years later, he is freed.

    GESTOSO: What do you think of the role of the National Electoral Council?

    MONCADA: I have no suspicions—I am certain they are not impartial referees. Since the 2009 coup, this democracy has been overseen by the United States. There is a deeply rooted oligarchy here that does not pay taxes and controls the economy. Those are the interests that have prevailed, and those are the ones I faced.

    GESTOSO: The playing field is marked, slanted and full of holes. And that is the trap underway. Did you know the field was completely tilted, and if so, why did you decide to take on the challenge?

    MONCADA: These are the challenges and struggles our peoples must fight constantly—not only in Honduras but across the region. These are important liberation processes that build collective awareness. For me, the two-year political campaign has been an extraordinary campaign. What did I learn? It allowed me to travel the country, understand different dynamics, and get closer to people in regions I did not fully know.

    The campaign was extraordinary, beautiful, and joyful. Those who turned out to vote for me gave votes of gold that are there, despite all the foreign interference, including the message 72 hours before the election saying Moncada is a communist. Even with that, people went to the polls, and their vote is sacred to me.

    GESTOSO: What mechanisms do you plan to use to reverse this scenario?

    MONCADA: All available ones: technical, legal, judicial, and political. We will listen to people in different regions, how they are handling the scrutiny process, and how we interpret contradictions between the two oligarchic candidates. Even they cannot reconcile their numbers.

    GESTOSO: What do you expect from the international community and election observers?

    MONCADA: I expect clear statements from the OAS and the European Union. Trump’s interference 72 hours before the election cannot be ignored. He violated the Democratic Charter, sovereignty, and the self-determination of peoples. If observers remain silent, they will be ignoring their own principles.

    GESTOSO: You have also spoken about media control in Honduras.