- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
And before you shrug and go “great, jobs are bullshit”:
Jobs, for all their cruelty, provide:
•structure (“I know where to be at 9”),
•community (office friendships, shared memes, gossip),
•identity (“I’m a nurse / teacher / carpenter,” for the lucky ones),
•a script (“I know what next year roughly looks like”).
Take that away and you don’t get instant utopia. You get a psychic freefall.
Imagine millions of people waking up one day structurally unnecessary to the economy, with no replacement narrative in place. Not “You’re free now,” but “The system doesn’t know what to do with you, please manage your own despair.”
That’s not liberation. That’s cruelty on a scale our nervous systems are not built for.
Think about Appalachia when the textile mills closed. Everywhere.
EDIT: for people who didn’t pay attention to my “think about Appalachia” comment.
Just because you can manage your own structure, community, and identity without a job doesn’t mean the people around you can too.
Especially older people who have spent their lives in the American capitalist system, which tells you over and over you are defined by the job you do and the things you buy with the money from that job. Hell, any of you with older relatives probably know somebody who retired, didn’t know what to do with themselves, declined and died a few years after.
And especially teenagers and young adults who were raised with the expectation of “grow up, go to college, get a job, raise a family” - and who suddenly won’t be able to get a job, as is already happening with the death of entry-level jobs and the increasing uselessness of college degrees - and have to define themselves and their future without ever having learned the tools to do so.
And when people lose the structure that gave their lives meaning, a lot of them find new meaning in their race, sex, or religion. And that’s how you get nationalist / fascist uprisings.
Because, going back to Appalachia, the reason Vance country is so deep fucking red is because “free trade” and neoliberalism sent all their jobs overseas and let Big Pharma addict their communities to opioids for profit, and because Democrats did two things about it, jack and shit.
You do not want to see what America turns into when half our jobs disappear into data centers and MAGA influencers convince millions of young men to blame immigrants and the left for their lack of a future. But I’m afraid you’re going to.
If my needs were actually covered by the surplus of productivity brought about by automation instead of going to some rich asshole so he can buy another private jet to do ketamine on or lobby for racism or whatever it is they do anymore, I’d be very happy with it all.
That’s stupid, you can create your own structure freely if you need it so much, but you also just don’t need it. Needing a paternalistic structure is intellectual laziness.
But not a consensual one. It is more like prison inmates, even if you like them. You should find your own community.
That’s skill and passion though, not wage labour. That’s why some jobs mean something and others do not.
My job doesn’t even remotely touch on my identity even though it’s my profession and what I studied for because while I love studying complex computer systems for flaws, I don’t actually give a shit about preventing some dysfunctional private equity portfolio fodder company’s bottom line from dropping.
More intellectual laziness. You can write your own script if you need one or just do what you actually want. Obviously that requires asking the hard question of what you actually want, but this shouldn’t be hard.
I’m no psychic but this sure feels like projection, and not the astral kind.
Thats great as long as the economy is restructured such that I no longer have obligations to it and benefit from productivity increases.
That’s stupid, sweeping statements about what our nervous systems are and are not built for have no basis in reality, even the basic idea of “we were meant to x” based in the pseudoscience of evolutionary psychology that’s parroted wildly by various bad vibe cottagecore enthusiasts and other conservative past romanticizers doesn’t make hold any more water than me saying that my nervous system was actually meant to post comments on Lemmy.
We weren’t meant to do anything, no one exists and nothing happens for any particular reason, we are a chaotic yet structured event on the way from a big bang in a race towards the thermodynamic equilibrium and ultimately the heat death of the universe.
This is a good thing, actually, because it means that you have the freedom to find your own purpose outside of merely wage labour or some other manufactured divine intent.
Go explore, go learn something or make something, once capitalism no longer demands of us the wageslavery we provide, we will be truly free to be ourselves, and I look forward to that day.
Hopefully the age of jobs will end as it should.
Your allegations of “intellectual laziness” are evidence of a lack of understanding of or empathy for the mental state of many (if not most) people. There are billions of people alive today that don’t have the mental framework to cope with this kind of change because our education systems are abysmally incapable of teaching people how to think critically, structurally, and existentially.
So if I can, what does that mean?
Because I’d prefer to assume, out of empathy, that it means that others are capable of it as well. I am nothing special at all, if I can do it, so can others.
If anything that’s the humble, empathetic assumption. I did not need to be taught, I went out of my way to learn these things. So it must be that others are capable of that too, right?
Because the alternative would be to assume less of others than of myself, which is actually the ugly, unempathetic assumption, which I’d prefer not to make.
My worldview rests on judging myself by the same standard I judge others, extending a theoretical stranger the same benefit of the doubt I’d extend myself. That - to me - is empathy.
Am I missing something? Is there a third way? Because I’d love to hear it.
People are capable of a great many things, but most people do not accomplish everything they are capable of.
I look at it this way: hypothetically, everyone is capable of running a marathon…until you consider that most people have not had the time, resources, or opportunities to train for a marathon, or are out of shape, or have physical injuries or disabilities, or they just don’t have time to train for and run a marathon. I don’t see it as “empathy” to assume that everyone is capable of the same things or that everyone has had the same opportunities that I have. If I expected everyone to have the knowledge and experience that I have sought out and worked for, I would be an atrocious physician because I would just assume that my patients were “non-compliant” instead of understanding that there are barriers that prevent people from achieving the things they want or need to do.
This is the difference between “Equality” and “Equity”. “Equality” gives everyone the same resources, assumptions, and expectations, regardless of where people are starting from. It’s the top-down approach. “Equity” is the bottom-up approach where you adjust resource allocation, alter expectations, and make educated assessments instead of assumptions to try to get everyone to the same end-point.
“Equity” is justice is how we build a better world. “Equality” is when we assume that everyone is capable of everything that we are, regardless of the barriers that others may face. It is not pity, devaluing, or dehumanizing to recognize that some people need more help than others. Not everyone is actually capable of everything, and we succeed as a society when we work to our own strengths and help to cover each other’s weaknesses.
Woaah now we’re talking opportunities? I never mentioned that at all.
I think it’s fairly obvious that in a world where we would no longer have to do work and there wasn’t a need to work to survive ala capitalism or hunter-gathering that people would have literally unlimited opportunities and unlimited time, and that’s what this conversation was originally about.
When you claimed “not everyone is a leader” in that context you are referring to innate ability only, not opportunities. There is an implied “all things being equal” in there.
You and I obviously agree on what you wrote in regards to equity etc, these are basic humanist notions, but they are also irrelevant in this discussion.
All things being equal, if a person could not find meaning in their life to move towards I would judge them for it because I was able to, and if I see myself as not innately better than others, then there is no reason that innately others shouldn’t be able to accomplish to a similar level that I had done.
The discussion is not centered around a post-work world that people have grown up in. This is a discussion about what happens to hundreds of millions of people when the fabric of their lives changes suddenly because the vast majority of people alive today have grown up and lived in a reality where their life is functionally defined by work. I’m not saying that this is a good thing, but it is the reality of the situation. Most people are not comfortable enough to sit with themselves and decide who they are as a person and figure out their real internal motivations because the necessity of work has made it fairly easy to avoid doing that difficult work.
It isn’t a pleasant opportunity, but the experience of being left rudderless, of having to sort things out on your own without a script or a clear path forward is one that many people don’t get, and one that many others fail to seize upon. There are enough people, particularly in America, that have been just comfortable enough to never have to really think about back up plans or contingencies for what to do with their life in the absence of its current structure.
And there are many reasons why people may not have the wherewithal to find meaning in their lives. Some people are so focused on survival that meaning hasn’t even occurred to them. Others are depressed or traumatized or otherwise miserable and it’s hard to find meaning in blinding pain. Some people have been spoon fed meaning by way of work since the day they were born and literally do not know any other way to exist. Personally, I was stuck in a blend of these things when I was still working in tech and it was in the throes of abject despair that I finally forced myself to make the changes required to pursue my life’s meaning through work as a physician. Getting into and through medical school has been a brutal process and it has been immensely painful to try to imagine alternatives after the amount of work I’ve put in to pursue this goal. I’m now within 6 months of graduating and will be starting residency next summer, but it won’t be in the specialty that I had hoped (and that I had already staked a piece of my identity to). I’ve suffered more hardship than many, but I have also been more comfortable than plenty of other people, but I would find a great deal of turmoil and misery trying to restructure my life without being able to work as a physician (and that’s not even getting into the financial nightmare of my student loan situation.)
If society really collapsed, and for some reason the post-society world didn’t leave space for me to be a physician or a healer of some kind, I would probably figure it out…but it would be so incredibly painful to do so. It would be horrible to give up on everything I have worked so hard for to have to replace it with whatever I could manage and I would be unlikely to be happy with whatever that solution ended up being for a long time until I finished grieving what could have been, because that’s what this process is. Losing everything you’ve structured your life on is a form of grief and not everyone is equipped to handle that grief gracefully and effectively while being able to carry on with their lives.
you have mad ‘bootstraps’ vibe. not everyone is a leader and without that skill/mindset, loads of people will be rudderless.
Thats specious reasoning, I see no evidence anyone is a “leader” any more than anyone else, so I think you should be your own leader. Self-governance in your humanity and your life is a joy to be celebrated.
Bet you’re fun at parties
Yes