• chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It can be more productive than trying to resolve conflicts internally. But yeah someone has to actually do the work.

      In this case the fork was created by someone who has never worked on Calibre before and they haven’t even cherry picked out the AI commits yet, only updated the readme.

        • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Some are certainly long enough or quibble-over-terminology enough to make a Trot paper blush… though they are usually a fair bit better on the signal to noise ratio, unless a maintainer’s having an ideological rant they’re often only long because software is complicated.

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah, but it also makes “forking” into a more ambiguous term overall. A GitHub fork can be a clone with a working branch or an actual fork and it’s not immediately obvious until you look at the code.

          That’s why I use the README test to see if a forked repo is an actual fork since almost no one will modify the README if their GitHub fork is actually a work branch.