• DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    How do you know they weren’t asked to bring the gun?

    The article says he was ‘tasked with security’, whatever that means. I don’t know, so I wonder what more you know about this.

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      Pretty sure the shooter was “tasked with security”. The victim appears to have brought his own weapon unprompted, and was assembling it on site, which, yeah, looks very sus. I think they made the right call but I also think it’s not a good idea to roll up and start assembling your rifle in a protest environment, least of all one like this where it stands out.

      • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        In Utah and other open carry states leftists have been marching at protests with guns for years, he was probably assembling it on site because it’s easier to transport that way. I agree this wasn’t a good protest for it but he had been armed at protests in the area previously, with other people armed also.

        • john_brown [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 days ago

          Open carrying only makes sense in the context of there being other open carriers you’re organized with. Going solo with a gun just reads as mass shooter shit, and makes you an obvious target if a shooter shows up. In this case, because another open carrying “protector” might decide to smoke you because you’re just a rando with a rifle