• @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    951 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be easier to list ones who aren’t overrated?

    I really don’t understand the popularity of the “big” YouTubers. PewDiePie being the prime example from a few years ago, though I don’t think he’s still making videos.

    • @Tuss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      481 year ago

      Pew is still making content but it’s more vlogs about him trying to stop being a hyped up youtuber and to find work life balance while now also raising a tiny bebe.

      So he moved to Japan so that people wouldn’t recognise him as much, started making friends and is now living quite a normal life to what he used to do.

    • @trslim@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      While I agree that most the big youtubers are overrated, I still really like Markiplier for some reason. Idk, he just kinda grew up with me and he still plays games. Plus I like Distractable.

      • @Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        I feel like this is pretty much the path the large majority of YouTubers take. They gain a following. Stay consistent over the years. Slowly grow. And after a while people just watch because that’s what they’ve always done for years. The person could post a video of them just like peeling a potato and plenty people would still watch just cause.

      • @wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        He is rich enough to not desperately beg for likes and comments at every other breath. I don’t even think YouTube paid people back when he got popular. Maybe they did and I’m just dumb, but I don’t remember that being a thing.

        That simple omission makes his content easier to watch than most in my opinion. Plus he seems like an actually cool guy. I’ve never heard of a real life scumbag example of him. Not saying he’s a saint or anything, but with his size of an audience, I would think news about him being a jerk would be spread around, but I haven’t heard of any.

        Seems like he’s pursuing other career paths at this point, as his posting frequency has gone way down, unless the algorithm isn’t bringing him up as much for me, haven’t really checked into it. But since making his 2nd big “choose your own adventure” project, he seems like he’s doing bigger stuff.

        Which I’m happy for him in that regard. I miss the consistency, but he’s just a busy guy now.

        Distractible I’m really behind on, but I do like it.

          • @wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            That’s great to hear. I would probably love to hang with him in a setting where he wasn’t in a “hang out with a random fan” kinda situation, which has good be uncomfortable for famous people.

            If there was a legit reason it lived intersected, it would probably be a kick-ass time.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I don’t really follow any of the big ones, and the creators I do follow are pretty nice :)

      • @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I mainly subscribe to ASMRists, and even then I don’t follow the bigger ones because I don’t enjoy their content.

        And one of the gaming channels I follow is brilliant and yet they have so few subscribers. Filthy Casuals, three Australian comedians chatting about games. Their Let’s Plays are great.

    • @Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It would probably make more sense for them to be evaluated in comparison to similar offerings withing the respective “genres” which would be hard for those that don’t fit in to neatly defined formats, but it seems that most do.

      I couldn’t watch PewDiePie, it’s damned irritating, but it’s an entire format and style of video that some people like and he seems presumably to be the king of it and is widely emulated so it would be saying something then if you consider him overrated within that context. I couldn’t venture an opinion though because I would just never watch that kind of video.

      • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        While I dislike PewDie as an adult, had I discovered him at the age of 13, I’d have absolutely loved him.

        I feel like people frequently forget that internet demographics are very unique compared to the overall demographics of the whole population. It is definitely easier and more fun to spend lots of time on here while you’re still very young, and generally have more free time and open curiosity.

  • PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    82
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    MrBeast and his many imitators. Don’t get the appeal and the constant shouting voice is very annoying to me. I guess I’m just too old.

  • @j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 year ago

    Almost everyone that is on the popular front page feed. I loath the emotional content, drama, click bait type nonsense.

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Yeah, it’s amazing how quickly you figure out you’re not logged into your account when you load the homepage. Literally none of the videos that are popular is anything I’d ever consider watching.

      • @DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        All I see in the “you’re not logged in” frontpage is music videos anyways, and not conventional youtubers. I dunno how someone finds Mr. beast “organically”.

  • snowe
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    Veritasium. As soon as he put out a video with sponsored content where he lied with science I immediately knew he could no longer be trusted. I completely stopped watching his videos that day.

    • @Tristano@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I kinda slowed down on his videos since that Tom Nicolas video, but I watched his video from a few days ago about blimps because blimps are cool. But it just seemed like a corporate ad. The amount of the video that’s renders of products vs actual products is pretty bad.

      It didn’t feel like a science video about blimps, it felt like half blimp startup ad, half simple blimp explanation. I don’t know, it just felt a little devoid of depth.

      • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I would really like a channel that covers start-ups well, like explaining their idea and what they hope to accomplish then going into some of the challenges they face.

        Far too many seem to be nothing but reading the press release and the first couple of paragraphs of Wikipedia.

      • @ItsPlasmaSir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        25
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There was this one from a couple years ago that was about self-driving cars and also sponsored by Waymo. Tom Nicholas made a video which IMO does a good job of covering the problems with that video, and the broader implications of this kind of content on YouTube.

      • snowe
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        found it. https://youtu.be/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983

        there’s even people in the comments that don’t realize the experiment was bad science and think that maybe these wipes are ‘different’

        more people actually saying they’re going to switch to flushable wipes.

        • @mudeth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Thanks for the answers! I had a bad taste in my mouth after his dandruff video which felt very corporate but I gave him the benefit of the doubt assuming that the science was solid. I guess my gut instinct was right.

          I still think a lot of his videos are good, it’s just sad that the obviously sponsored ones are low quality. I’ll check out the links and response video someone else posted and keep being skeptical.

      • snowe
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        I don’t remember which video it was, I’d have to go find it. At the end he sets up a ‘science experiment’ to show that wet wipes are flushable, unlike what everyone says. And the way he ‘proves’ it is clearly a terrible way to prove it, but if you aren’t thinking about it you’ll agree. I’ll try to find the video.

            • @CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Thanks for sharing that. I’ll agree it’s pretty dubious, but not enough to stop me enjoying their other content. But I have a pretty high skeptic quotient for everything online to begin with so, a little light shilling isn’t enough to turn me off of a channel that’s otherwise entertaining and often thought-provoking.

              That “experiment” definitely deserves the mythbusters treatment, though. Even if that brand breaks into pieces faster, that doesn’t account for total breakdown or even what happens to its individual fibers after flushing. More data needed.

      • snowe
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        yeah. honestly it stinks because he did have good science videos. but as soon as he sold out and the way he did so I knew he was no longer an educational channel.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    All influencer types. Influencing kids to be more vain, more selfish, more money focused, more vapid and empty?

  • @hatchet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    So many tech YouTubers are overrated, but one who really stands out to me is JayzTwoCents. Somehow I have several memories of clicking on one of his videos and being shocked at him being confidently incorrect about something. I no longer click on his videos at all.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    MrBeast is a horrible example of a person and everyone acts like he’s a second coming out Jesus. He fucks up people’s lives with his “charity” on a regular basis.

    PewDiePie is one of the most annoying people ever born.

      • JGrffn
        link
        fedilink
        191 year ago

        Yeah I want to know as well. His content isn’t exactly my cup of tea and can feel dystopia, but my dude flies around the world giving away free surgery to people and shit, and he promotes charities and foundations and actually moves people to donate to them. His thumbnails are creepy as shit, and his content feels like it was made to be cut up into a bunch of 6 second tiktok videos, but I don’t really see a dark side here.

        • @LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I’m no Mr beast fan, but the dystopia you feel isn’t his fault. It’s the fault of our society. It’s the fact that some people have to rely on a clickbait youtubers generosity to have vision surgery, instead of it being freely available. It’s the fact that inequality is so rampant and ever growing due to our infinite capacity for greed.

  • @Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    Kurtuzeg. And alot of the “science” channels. They are so full of shit sometimes.

    • @Matthew@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Their videos about the immune system are really good and educational (according to me, who has no idea if they’re just making shit up). But pretty much everything else they make is just pop science.

      • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree. Like most science channels, they’re really good when they stick to pure science.

        The issues usually occur when they decide to weigh in on a social or policy issue that they’re not qualified to talk about. Kurtzgesagt’s blunders all seem to be related to climate policy videos and their wishful thinking regarding Hail Mary technologies saving us.

        For other readers, my bias is generally pro kurtzgesagt, I have several of their posters on my wall. Their social policy videos have just been really rubbing me the wrong way.

    • darcy
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      science ‘education’ channels try not to be extremely biased and corrupt challenge

    • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Sabine has been posting a lot of cringe lately. Such a bummer when a physicist decides to go down the 2009 history channel swerving out of their lane career path.

    • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I find them all overrated and I subscribe to zero channels. I only use YouTube when I’m looking for a specific video, and then I watch what I came for and leave without any interaction of any kind with the social aspect of the site.

    • @jhulten@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Isn’t it great, not being defined in opposition to triviality?

      But for real, everyone is mentioning the same ten creators. It’s not a great question.

  • WuTang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Mr Beast and his fucking thumbnails with open mouth and ugly mustache. How come such douche can make 5M views in 2days, it baffles me.

    • @Zangoose
      link
      221 year ago

      How so? I usually find their content pretty interesting

        • @DrQuint@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          Often is too harsh a term, but that bioweapons video is 100% sus. It got worse when someone pointed out the video has no birds. It’s as if they quietly aknowledged something stinked with it.

    • nik0
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Why are you even getting downvoted when someone else said the exact same thing?

    • No. There are plenty of YouTubers who make excellent content but are struggling to get views, hardly fits the definition of overrated. Just because they chose YouTube as a platform doesn’t automatically invalidate their work. Besides, which other platform do you want them to go to?

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    MKBHD simply because I have absolutely no idea what the point in the channel is.

    Obstensively it’s a tech review channel, but really it seems to be a look at my cinematography and all this b-roll footage channel. Also iPhones, which is always boring because let’s face it the last time Apple did anything close to innovative with the iPhone was the the 5C.

    • @LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I mean you nailed it. It’s entertainment - validation for people who want to buy the shiny new Apple thing. “Look how cool it looks in these artsy shots”, forgetting it’s a carbon copy of last year’s model.

    • @fateiscalling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I use MKBHD as a source of surface information to find quick info about certain products. Of course the info he gives out is a little biased but the videos are short and entertaining. Still end up doing my own research before purchasing though.

  • Another one I’d mention is Rooster Teeth (the whole gang). I watched some of their “shenanigans” videos and they were just destroying office furniture, doing shitty pranks and in general being man-childs.

    I just thought all the mess they left behind for everyone not on camera and what a shitshow it must be for the production crew to work with a bunch of internet mini-celebrities. They were basically the OG streaming mansion.

    Fast forward a few years and you hear all these allegations of terrible work conditions. Go figure.