Snip:
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen also responded on the same day through social media, issuing a blunt warning.
“That’s enough now,” he wrote, followed by a firmer rejection saying “No more pressure. No more insinuations. No more fantasies of annexation.”
Nielsen emphasized that Greenland remains open to engagement but set clear limits, saying “We are open to dialogue. We are open to discussions,” adding that any talks must take place “through the proper channels and with respect for international law.”
The dispute centers on Trump’s repeated claims that Greenland should become part of the US, a position he reiterated while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One and in a separate interview with The Atlantic.
Certainly. Greenland has a very small population (only around 60,000), most of which live in small settlements near the island’s coasts. It would not be able to put up any serious resistance to a US imperialist invasion.
What’s interesting geopolitically is how this would effect Washington’s relationship with its EU puppets. Greenland is a large chunk of EU-controlled territory. The US puppets in Brussels would be super pissed to have it taken from them. Such a move could potentially play a role in causing some kind of split between Washington and its continental European puppets.
Would they be pissed? I think they’d roll over like good little lapdogs
I grew up in a suburb not even attached to a major US city. It has a 60,000+ population right now lmao. Absolutely wild there’s European countries smaller than NYC or LA in both population and area.