• just2look@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are some uses where eliminate would make sense and annihilate wouldn’t though. And vice versa. Like eliminating wasteful expenditures. Annihilate wouldn’t really work. So very similar words, but not a 1:1 substitution.

    • Redacted@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Annihilating wasteful expenditures is a perfectly acceptable thing to say, i dont think your example is correct.

      • just2look@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It may technically be correct, but the connotation is different. Annihilate suggests more violence or aggression, where eliminate likely does not in that context.

        Its word choices like this that make writing sound strange when people use a thesaurus to try to add variety or to make something sound ‘smarter’.

        Certain word choices can be more emotionally loaded, more likely to provoke certain thoughts or associations.

          • just2look@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            In some contexts eliminate would be violent and aggressive. If you eliminate a witness or eliminate competition it has a very different connotation to eliminating a bad habit for example.

            Admittedly there can be variation in how people interpret word choice, but there are still differences between the two words.

            • scuppie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              +1 to you, otherwise

              When You Have annihilated the Impossible Whatever Remains, However Improbable, Must Be the Truth

              There’s a difference between destroying something so it can never be true, and ruling it out through deductive reasoning why it can’t be true. There’s a greater opportunity to learn by dismissing something but leaving it intact.