True, but filling bugs, making pull requests, reviewing them and links to between projects ports much worse between forges.
To be fair, I think that is mostly a failure of git to take in these features to free them from the forges. Maybe radicle had a chance of fixing that, but…
It is really easy to mirror git repos though, which makes this less of an issue than most other monopolies
True, but filling bugs, making pull requests, reviewing them and links to between projects ports much worse between forges.
To be fair, I think that is mostly a failure of git to take in these features to free them from the forges. Maybe radicle had a chance of fixing that, but…
Fossil does, but it follows a very different FOSS deveopment style, The Cathedral Style (Git follows the Bazaar style)
Yeah, and I think that nothing that is not git compatible has any chance
Fossil can export it’s repos to git & import repos from git
Have I missed something? Does that mean I can use fossil to work on and contribute to git based projects seamlessly?
It’s more like; you can maintain a mirror of your fossil project.
Sad, that is the feature that is really needed for an incremental transition. Without it, I do not see that adoption is actually plausible.
Projects lose things like issue tracking, discussions which are not git features.