Called Skovsporet, or “The Forest Trail,” the development is now home to 36 student apartments in the town of Holstebro, Denmark.

  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author seem to have taken the press-statement from the 3d-printing-company and subtracted some pictures and the metric units.
    Without transparency about costs per m² compared to other construction methods it is just an advert.

    Unfortunately, I couldn’t really find more information. All results of a web search about this project in this state seem to be the same press statement almost copied verbatim.

    • Asinus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think the manufacturer will publish those numbers.

      On the peri-website, there are some numbers relating to printing-speed, layer-thickness and -width and setup-times (english / german). With those one could calculate approximately how long it could take to print a certain building in optimal conditions.

      More than that you will probably not get out of them.

      Unfortunately, I couldn’t really find more information. All results of a web search about this project in this state seem to be the same press statement almost copied verbatim.

      My comment was no dig at you for choosing that article. 3d-printing is kind of interesting and with the scale of printers needed here, there will not be a lot of independent information very soon.

      But I’m glad there is some public focus on construction methods, even if the “recent” developments in construction that I personally think are good for future-proofing the industry and reducing CO2-emissions (like increased use of prefabrication even on smaller scales and more use of wood on larger scales (e.g. cross-laminated-timber) are not that “interesting” to the public.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My comment was no dig at you for choosing that article.

        I didn’t take it as that. I just find the topic interesting and a probably pioneering new technology that could benefit us all (yeah, I know, it’s not gonna benefit us all for fucking capitalism, but it has the potential) is very intriguing to me. The monetary side of things is just something that usually does not pop into my mind at firsr, so.your comment was a reminder that it could be a relevant question and I’m kinda disappointed I couldn’t find more info about it. I’m even more disappointed though that all the news outlets has word by word almost identical articles posted and there was no sign of actual research in their behalf.

        • Asinus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That might (sadly) be a product of our times:

          1. Some interesting topic (3d-printing) pops up
          2. People reuse that information on their ad-monetized platform.
          3. profit…