• wylinka@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 minutes ago

    Unless you’re Chinese or East Asian, you come across as a racist for using that term.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. When I looked up the term, I got this summary:

      Tofu dreg is a Chinese slang term, literally meaning “tofu residue,” used metaphorically to describe poorly constructed buildings or infrastructure that are structurally unsound and prone to collapse. The phrase was first coined by former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji in 1998 during a visit to Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, where he criticized flimsy flood defenses as being "as weak as tofu dregs."

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is what most of China’s rapid construction projects end up being. And that’s only the stuff that’s uncensored or managed to escape censorship.

      The Chinese government even regularly suppresses media and the populace from finding out about the lacklustre building standards throughout China.

      Worker and civilian safety is not a priority in China, it’s shocking the amount of footage of unsafe working conditions there is, so many factory deaths are due to literally no guardrails. Yet Tankies, supposed communists, don’t give a shit about worker rights.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        This is what most of China’s rapid construction projects end up being.

        Well, I think I found the logic behind the boot. Wildly different to say construction standards are a problem than to conclude the majority of buildings are defective and dangerously prone to collapse.

        Might also be noted that this isn’t something that’s gone unaddressed. Police in China arrest 9 people linked to Changsha building collapse that left dozens missing

        At the same time, you’ll have western media insisting the draconian Chinese police state is cruelly persecuting businessmen in the country.

        Guo Wengui is a great example - a man who turned “Exiled Persecuted Chinese Businessman” into a cottage industry, bouncing from cable news show to right-wing radio program to complain about the villainous evil far-left authoritarian communist police state that was harassing him illegally for fake crimes he’s falsely accused of. And then he gets caught running scams in the US using the same modus operandi Chinese prosecutors sought him out over.

        Worker and civilian safety is not a priority in China

        This is flatly untrue, particularly since the Xi administration began cracking down on corruption at the municipal level nationwide. But it is routinely asserted that instances where corruption and malfeasance occur are “normal”. Meanwhile, instances where the police investigate and arrest corrupt and incompetent administrators are “persecution”.

        It’s “heads-China-bad” / “tails-China-bad”.

        What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

        -Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and the Reds

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There have been roughly 245 Chinese building collapse accidents in the construction industry between 2015 and 2018 in China, resulting in the deaths of 451 people. And that’s only what’s allowed to be reported on and what isn’t censored. China and India are much further ahead in building collapses than the rest of the world, because their standards are lacklustre, prioritising speed over safety.

          Never said the majority of their buildings, only the construction they build fast.

        • Emopunker@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Can you maybe make a post actually engaging with criticism rather than making a bunch of strawmen and talking about right wing grifters in an effort to delegitimize any criticism of China?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Sadly, any serious analysis is meet with “Wumao Bot Tankie” on reflex.

            More than two word of a post that don’t begin “China Bad” bounce right off the mental deflector dish reactionaries shelter under.

            • TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              19 hours ago

              You only get called a wumao if you parrot the official CCP line and never accept criticism of China or see any criticism as not legitimate. Also trying to paint China and it’s government as flawless or deflecting any criticism to “what about the US on the topic” instead of actually addressing it will also get you called a wumao.

              You aren’t exactly making yourself credible so far.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                You only get called a wumao if you parrot the official CCP line

                Anything that isn’t reactionary propaganda against China is “the official CCP line”. You can say the most inane shit about their high speed rail network or post pretty pictures from the fucking Panda Sanctuary and it’s CCP propaganda.

                Also trying to paint China and it’s government as flawless or deflecting any criticism

                You’re just proving my point. How can you engage in any kind of serious discussion when the rebuttal is “You think China is perfect!” and “Stop talking about non-China countries for comparison!”

                How do you have a serious discussion when even the most minor concession is met by “So you admit China Bad! I win!” Nevermind when there’s actual criticism rather than paranoid bullshit, and its just ignored because it doesn’t sound critical enough.

                • TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Proving your point? You are literally angry that no one is gonna let you argue in bad faith by deflecting arguments away from criticism of China when there are legitimate concerns about how things in China goes. Because the US is shit, doesn’t mean China can use that as a standard. Setting the bar so low is why you suck at debating.

    • Emopunker@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Traditionally it means a racist mock depiction of Asian culture and art. What tankies understand as orientalism: When non-Asians talk about what happens in Asia. They think it is like mansplaining or Americansplaining stuff (when people who have no idea about x topic talk about said topic). In short, tankies just simply think they know better and everyone else only makes racist assumptions about China.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      In this context it refers to Westerners patronizing Asians and people from the Middle East. It comes from Orient and also is used to describe Western art, which immitates arts from the North Africa, Middle East and Asia. So it depends on the context if it is actually bad.

      • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        also is used to describe Western art, which immitates arts from the North Africa, Middle East and Asia

        Not necessarily imitate their art (which would probably result in artistically more interesting works), but mainly present the foreign people and cultures in an exoticising and stereotyped manner, as objects of fascination rather than normal culture.

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I personally like a lot of the art, which is very clearly Orientalism. Gaudi for example clearly stands on his own, but also obviously imitated Islamic tile art, especially in his early works. Also a lot of Art Nouveau graphic art imitates very clearly Chinese and especially Japanese prints. I also have a hard time seeing it as racist to do so, but sure I guess I am and stuff like this is shit.

        • lemonmelon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Not necessarily imitate their art (which would probably result in artistically more interesting works), but mainly present the foreign people and cultures in an exoticising and stereotyped manner, as objects of fascination rather than normal culture.

          The bold section sounds like presentation as an object of fascination.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    People who complain about .ml are the same as people who talk about awful Twitter is while still using Twitter.