- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
- technology@lemmy.world
- climate@slrpnk.net
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
- technology@lemmy.world
- climate@slrpnk.net
cross-posted from : https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/62503515
Besides we can still use that same land for crops with agrivoltaics




I did a bit of research along the lines of this article a few months ago to settle an argument, specifically about the state of Iowa in the US, about just corn for ethanol production (the primary source of ethanol in the US). I made a few assumptions, but always took the more generous middle ground for ethanol.
First its astounding how much land we dedicate to crops there, its 68% of the state for all crops, with 94% of that being feed corn and soy beans. That’s 22.6 million acres (91,300 km²) dedicated to two crops we largely do not eat.
Second and more on topic, the state of Iowa net produces about 56,389 GWh/yr from ethanol taking up 4.5 million acres (18,212 km²), and it would only take 28,000 acres (113 km²) of solar to produce the same amount.
I like haven’t done the math on this one, but I bet you could make that up from solar on walmart roofs and parking lots in Iowa alone. Maybe that’ll be my tomorrow project.
I like to hope we scale EVs down in size and weight and ramp up train/trolley/trolley busses to reduce required energy to power transportation, then we wouldn’t need to cover Poland with panels!
The article in the OP is somewhat misleading, as it shows that transportation would be entirely covered by only one quarter of the area of Poland. The entire 320,000km square would cover the all of the globe’s energy usage, including transport.