• cannedtuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      6 days ago

      Pretty sure they were also old as hell too, so they got to like regain their youth. Sort of a win if you don’t mind living, well, here. You know, rather than a magical world with talking animals and stuff.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        6 days ago

        As I recall, they were adults but not old. I think they were riding through the forest, got off their horses to follow some light in the denser trees or something, then fell out of the wardrobe and couldn’t get back.

        In hindsight, those horses definitely fled the country or got executed.

        • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah I think based on the later books, Peter would’ve been at most like maybe early thirties but probably only late twenties by the time they leave Narnia. And Lucy would’ve been like early to mid twenties. So they were adults, but certainly not old. In fact, it’s mentioned that Susan was courted by many princes and in The Horse and His Boy (warning: it’s super fucking racist and Islamophobic) she’s genuinely considering marrying someone but it turns out he’s pretty horrible. Right after the events of The Horse and His Boy, the kids hunt the white stag, see the lamppost, dimly remember the Wardrobe and end up back in our world

          As for the horses, unlike in the movies, in the books it’s said that it’s very rare for people to ride talking horses bc talking horses are free in Narnia. So in the books they would’ve been riding normal horses that they probably wouldn’t bother punishing

            • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              So basically in The Magician’s Nephew we see the creation of Narnia and how the White Witch got there. And after creating all the animals Aslan picked out two from a handful of different species and gave them the ability to speak. He also made the small animals, like squirrels, bigger and the big animals, like elephants, smaller (but only the ones that could speak changed size). So the descendants of the speaking ones can speak and the non-speaking ones (which are literally called the dumb ones in the books) can’t speak. Some species can’t talk and aren’t intelligent, like the mice in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. But bc the mice in that book chewed through the ropes that bound Aslan on the stone table they were eventually gifted with speech and intelligence which is why Reepicheep and his friends can talk by the time of Voyage of the Dawn Treader

            • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Well… not in Narnia, no. There is a completely separate show (based on different books iirc) called The Magicians which as a concept is like Narnia but darker (also a bit of Harry Potter bc there’s a magical grad school). And in The Magicians they do bring up the matter of human-animal relationships since the animals in the magical world can talk and all

              • tetris11@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Im not against the human-magicalanimal pairing, it was more relief that they werent dating each other.

                Thanks for the recommendation about The Magicians though!

        • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 days ago

          I really hope they instituted democratic elections or at least established a clear line of succession because the power vacuum caused by the sudden disappearance of the entire top level of revolutionary leaders is bad news for everyone hoping for a peaceful couple of decades.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Reading all of this is both hilarious and disturbing. The post itself and this whole comment chain is just “I read it 30 years ago and barely remember anything but here’s my take on those vague memories”. And I’m replying to the very top comments, what the fuck is happening? It’s so fucking weird.

          • ceenote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I was being honest, the last time I read any of those books was probably 20+ years ago, but I read them repeatedly before then.

          • topherclay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            lmao yeah it’s a Ken Burns documentary where we are getting the first hand accounts of the civil war because we can’t go back and watch the reply of the actual events but instead it’s a comment thread about a tweet about a movie about a book.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        But when they returned to Narnia they were still young again.

        So they got Narnia plus they also got the youth.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      Been a while since I read the books, but weren’t they a bunch of Christian kids coming up with a fantasy explanation so they could spend hours in the closet together?