• huppakee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Personally i’d rather see certain mechanisms banned, rather then certain websites. Knives are imo a great example of how you can target a certain kind of use by making laws very specific: kitchen knives are totally legal to sell in the netherlands, but all self-respecting companies have policies not to sell to minors. If they’re in your kitchen you’re totally fine, if you bring them to a football match youre breaking a law (because of ‘intent of use’). Also, if you have a knife in your kitchen that isn’t meant for cutting food (e.g. a certain size, station, certain mechanisms) you’re breaking the law because those types of knives are always considered to be intended as a weapon. There are clear rules on when it is a useful tool and when it is a dangerous weapon. We can also make this for code.

    • Tehdastehdas@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Banning time-spent rewarding (ad-funded, pay-to-play) business models would remove the incentive to cause addiction.

      • huppakee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Selling lootboxes without telling what’s in them is banned in the Netherlands because it is considered gambling. Great move if you ask me.

    • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The most of the articles of the DSA regulates social media like this without age restrictions (ignoring the one vague article about age restriction).

      Unfortunately, the DSA is not enforced due to fears of retaliation by Trump.