• SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look she’s a horrible person and I hate her as much as the next trans, but none of the news coverage on it I’ve seen so far actually has any evidence she was involved in the invitation. This kind of enthusiastic perpetuation of misinformation isn’t ok just because it aligns with our views.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      JK Rowling has an extremely murky supply chain. By choice.

      A good example I heard a while back: Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh was one of the worst industrial accidents ever. Death toll in the thousands. One of the companies involved was Primark, which makes the official Harry Potter apparel. Was HP apparel actually made in this particular death trap? We don’t know. JK won’t discuss it. But you know what she says, she just takes one look at her bank statement and all of the worries go away. We know that much.

      Epstein invitation thing was just more of the same. Was JK personally involved? We don’t know. Did JK care? Evidently not.

      • SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s a good analysis. I’m not trying to defend her here, just saying that framing it as she did it herself is a sloppy reading of the evidence.

      • SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Mis/disinformation contributes to the current culture of political divisiveness that is actively weaponized as a tool by the far right to harm trans people in service of their political goals. Rowling is an active participant in that. The normalizing of misinformation as part of a post truth world makes it easy to demonize trans people because then you don’t have to care about all the evidence that runs contrary to the fear mongering. We’re not going to build a just world safe for trans people with fascist tools, and we’re not going to resist transphobia using their playbook.

        In this specific context, it is also a needlessly weak argument. It’s easily dismissed by people sympathetic to her as factually inaccurate, and plays into Rowling’s demonizing of trans people. U/rose’s reply is far more compelling an analysis. There’s plenty of fucked up things about her, we don’t need to overreach.

        Also, call me old fashioned but yes, just because. I think critical thinking and showing the evidence is a good thing actually.

    • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was actually the whole joke here. She spent all this time spreading unfounded rumors about trans people and now there will be unfounded rumors about her because Epstein mentioned her in an email.

      • ghost@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The joke in the meme is John Cena laughing at JKR being in the Epstein files, though. That’s not a joke, it’s disinformation.

        If the text said something about it being rumored, that would feel more like a joke. That would be sweet karma. But it’s not cool when they post disinformation, and it’s not cool when we do it either.

        While it’s non-defensible; a lot of people just believe what they see in memes. A family member of mine is like that.

        • Zangoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The joke in the meme is John Cena laughing at JKR being in the Epstein files, though. That’s not a joke, it’s disinformation.

          But JKR is objectively “in the Epstein files.” It’s not clear whether she was directly or intentionally involved, but her name is absolutely present in the files. This meme isn’t misinformation at all.

          • ghost@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Her name appearing in the files is not the same as “JK Rowling being in the files.”

            Don’t defend this kind of thinking… When I see it, I just see an agitator.

            • Taleya@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              After the shit she’s pulled, i could not give a single wet fart about the precious reputation of that transphobic little fuck.

              • ghost@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                It’s not about her. It’s about us and the standards we hold ourselves to.

                • Taleya@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 minutes ago

                  One of my standards is not rewarding people who dedicate their lives to killing my friends

        • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          22 hours ago

          John Cena… The guy who’s famous for saying “You can’t see me!” which spawned millions of memes.

          It’s called tongue in cheek… I deserve smarter detractors.

          • ghost@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            22 hours ago

            That makes no sense.

            “The guy who says ‘You can’t see me’ thinks its funny that JKR is in the Epstein files” doesn’t change anything.

            The “personal attack” quip shows your hand, anyway.

            Look, all I’m saying is that if someone goes and repeats disinformation to someone who knows better, it makes them look dumb, which makes the movement look dumb. It doesn’t help anyone. It makes us more emotional, which makes us less effective.

      • SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Sounds like your meme went over my head then, but I still maintain that the comment I replied to is possibly misinformation.

        • ghost@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Thank you for bringing this up. I agree, disinformation is harmful no matter where it comes from.