• zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also there’s the fact that Australia doesn’t have a car industry, so it’s a choice between imported cars and other imported cars.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not the biggest issue if there was a healthy competitive market. But if go full on Chinese low priced, government subsidized, good/great/innovative EVs, we might end up destroying the industry outside China and we’ll get stuck with Chinese for good. This would be problematic for every monopoly, not just Chinese, but they are really kicking asses with EVs.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Okay, but buying terrible, expensive vehicles from companies that fight tooth and nail to continue focusing on huge petrol SUVs isn’t going to help.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Holy shit, Lemmy, maybe a little reading would help your hot takes.

          The US government paid out $85B to Detroit in 2008 and since then their vehicles have only gotten bigger, less reliable and more expensive.

          Tesla alone got $15B in various credits. It’s the only way they make money.

            • zurohki@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              They’re saying that US vehicles are also government subsidized, they just pocketed the money instead of actually improving their products. So comparing the Chinese products to the US ones isn’t unfair, the US products really are that bad and they deserve to fail.

              • Mihies@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Chinese are much cheaper and probably more advanced in many ways. If they are both subsidized ( and I didn’t say they are not), doesn’t help either of them.