• cogman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Caught me. Was just an easy number to pull.

    But I’d argue that 2% is still something to look at. A 2% shortfall in power capacity still means you are looking at rolling blackouts to handle the demand/production mismatch. If power has to be rationed, then I’d much rather have an extra ~50k AC units running vs pretty lights for advertisements. Especially since load tends to peak during the day anyways. Shutting off the lights during the day makes sense.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      That 2% would be of what the residential ac units are using, not total. It’s fraction of a fraction of a fraction. 3 % of residents deciding to not shut their ac off consumes 33% more electricity than times square.

      I get the optics, and I’m in favor of forcing businesses to put residents first, but they need to do more than just shut off their lights.