• darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason I opened the article, “whatchu mean fear of peace talks?!”

      Like I get it, Ukraine shouldn’t capitulate. But ending the bloodshed is a good thing, surely.

      • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        To what end though? Freeze the border where it is now and give Russia another few years to build up force for round 3?

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I suppose that’s up to Ukraine, right? They’re the ones fighting so it makes sense for them to decide what terms they’d be willing to accept.

          • hypelightfly@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, you didn’t read the article? The fear is not about peace talks, it’s about support from the US forcing them while Ukraine is making progress.

      • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is that we’ve already tried the whole peace thing before. Remember the Budapest Memorandum? The Minsk Protocol & Minsk II? The Partition & Friendship Treaties?

        I feel like the heart of the issue is that Russia doesn’t want peace. If it did, we would not be here in the first place.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean the Minsk agreements Ukraine refused to implement for 8 years, and the west has now admitted were designed to buy time to arm Ukraine for the proxy war. Not really helping your case there bud.

          • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            …Ukraine refused to implement for 8 years, and the west has now admitted were designed to buy time to arm Ukraine for the proxy war

            [citation needed]

              • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                can’t even be bothered to google?

                No, I’m invoking Hitchen’s Razor.

                While I will concede the Minsk Agreement, there’s still the issue of the Partition Treaty, the Treaty of Friendship, and the Budapest Memorandum. All of which were meant to encode Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Claiming there is no evidence for something that’s well documented is just flaunting your own ignorance. All of the treaties you mentioned were respected by Russia until US overthrew a democratically elected government in Ukraine in a violent coup. A fact that’s, once again, has been extensively documented in western media. It takes stunning amounts of intellectual dishonesty to ignore this and peddle your narrative.

                  • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Fuck off with this shit dude. We had a revolution to tell the Russian stooges to GTFO. You don’t get to gaslight a people for the choices they made. Your bias is showing моска́ль.

                    Don’t bother responding.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fear is that there is pressure for peace talk conditions to be less than fair to Ukraine, that this would be little more than appeasement of Russia, like what happened with Czechoslovakia in the 1930s

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ukraine was in a far better position when US and UK sabotaged peace talks last March, and Ukrainian position continues to deteriorate. So what exactly do you think delaying negotiations more is going to accomplish?

    • under2x@lemdit.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hill is a pretty conservative outlet but this is a disturbing headline for sure. The only way to end the war is with peace talks, there is no other option. The better Ukraine does on the ground the better they will do in the negotiations.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Always pay attention to the commenter‘s instance. All three above are hexbear users, so expect a heavy pro russian stance.

    • sunbeam60
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it will be “peace in our time”, won’t it? Wave that paper around some more, won’t you?

      Negotiating with terrorists and dictators does not work.