• CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is where simple logic and math collide with some weird emotional notion. Non-votes don’t stop the worse candidate - that helps them win. Sort of like the trolly problem. You are arguing that the act of not pulling the lever vs pulling the lever is relevant. Whether it’s an action or a non-action that implements your decision is irrelevant.

    • insurrection@mstdn.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      the trolley problem only reveals your own ethics. it doesn’t have a singular answer or lesson. deontologists don’t touch the lever, and they don’t vote for bad candidates, even if their are worse candidates.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Except in this case the trolly will kill a bunch of people if you pull the lever, or if you don’t, it will kill those people plus a whole lot more. The logic of which people are killed is removed and so if you don’t pull the lever you are responsible entirely for the deaths of the extra people.

        • insurrection@mstdn.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m only responsible for what I do. I didn’t create the situation in which the people were tied to the tracks of the trolley was set in motion. if I pull the lever I will kill people. I will choose not to kill people.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            And that stupidity is why America has trump, and lots more people will die in the Middle East. Just because you are too ignorant to understand, doesn’t mean you aren’t responsible for it.