• Aqarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Frankly, none of these countries is normal at all. It is a bit concerning that you apparently think otherwise.

    Normal isn’t a compliment here, it just means they’re not too far outside of what you run into out there, at least foreign policy-wise. For example, Pakistan springs to mind: fundamentalists with a vendetta, terrorists, and a nuclear program. Sounds about right.

    Not everyone, but two of these CAN call a veto whenever, to the benefit of whoever… Why should we pretend it isn’t so? Again, while you’re apparently very much focussed on who actually used the veto when, I am not. I am criticising the fact that the mere possibility exists.

    …Honestly, I was gonna say overuse would render it meaningless, but with the last week being what it is, It may very well be moot at this point.

    Was Iran attacked by Israel before they started to fund and steer all of their terror pawns in Arab countries several decades ago? Before they announced their objective to eliminate Israel?

    Milosevic didn’t attack NATO either. Once again, the hypothetical wasn’t about self-defense. It was about illegal intervention in prevention of gross human rights violations.

    • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Milosevic didn’t attack NATO either.

      That wasn’t the question, though. You said:

      Or, in fact, was Iran really only attacked last week?

      …which begs this aforementioned follow-up question.