Employees at some Chinese ministries must stop using iPhones before the end of September.

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    6910 months ago

    Of course it is, for the Chinese. Listen, if it isn’t a homegrown tech product, it’s a threat to your national security, and even most of the homegrown ones are, regardless of what nation you’re from or in. This is fact.

    • @emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Agreed. Investing in local R&D and having at least enough production capacity to locally manufacture enough decent-quality devices for government use is essential for national security.

      But it is also very expensive. The US and China can probably afford it, and I suppose the EU as a bloc can. But for anyone else the cost would be prohibitive. India is a top-five economy, and yet we have only been able to develop 130nm (!) chips locally. (Taiwan makes 5nm chips and China is now reaching 7nm.)

      Perhaps a solution would be for many of the ‘other’ countries to band together. The blueprints could be open-sourced so all partners can trust each other. Whether something like this will work in today’s political climate is of course another question.

  • @MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    63
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This seems like a logical step, both as a political counter move to the US limiting Huawei and TikTok, and as an actual security measure. If the Chinese state can get intel from Huawei devices, surely the US can get intel from iphones. I’m surprised they didn’t include Microsoft.

    Edit: a word.

  • Ertebolle
    link
    fedilink
    4510 months ago

    I mean it’s not like you’d catch a US government official carrying around a Huawei phone either - fair is fair.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    3410 months ago

    Of course they pose a national security risk. Imagine your government officials walking around with devices fully capable of recording bodily activities, location, sound, video, and transmit it to a foreign power, with or without the wearer’s knowledge. 🤯

    Then add the ability of third party powers to use Israel’s NSO spying capabilities for these devices.

    The moment I could replace these devices with my own home-grown ones, I would. If anything, it’s surprising it took them this long. Maybe they thought they had enough control over Apple.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      2210 months ago

      Imagine your government officials walking around with devices fully capable of recording bodily activities, location, sound, video, and transmit it to a foreign power, with or without the wearer’s knowledge.

      They don’t have to imagine it. They are actively DOING it with TikTok! Then there’s the not so small matter of all the spying that Huwaei was doing using their 5G network equipment.

      Here’s another one: Have you read the articles about Mozilla reporting what a privacy nightmare today’s cars are? China has banned Teslas from being parked in our around their Government Offices and Military bases. Today’s cars, especially EVs, are absolutely loaded with high end spy tech. Video recording in optical and non-optical wavelengths, audio recording, gps positioning, radar and ultrasound systems, remote control of those systems, remote data access to those systems…

      Since China banned Tesla’s cars from being parked in sensitive locations what do you think they are doing with their auto brands such as BYD?

      Everyone is spying on each other like mad.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Haven’t read Mozilla’s report but I’m in the field and am fully aware. What I can tell you is that at least some of the Motown manufacturers are very privacy oriented at least for now.

        Huawei is an unmitigated disaster. Security analyses of their equipment from some years ago showed hundreds of security holes on a single piece of infrastructure networking equipment. Countless vulnerable copies of OpenSSL, you name it. Even if they didn’t have any backdoors, the equipment was such a Swiss cheese that you could enter it from many of the gaping holes. The only reason we use it is cost, making the moneys for the shareholders.

  • BlinkerFluid
    link
    English
    3210 months ago

    Buy stock in Huawei, got it.

  • IWantToFuckSpez
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    iPhones pose a risk to the National Security Agencies’ ability to spy on the citizens

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Any US technology has NSA backdoors. I’m surprised it took them this long to realize, since they do the same thing.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      I’m sure they’ve known for years, there just wasn’t a lot they could do it about and relations with the US were good enough that it wasn’t a serious problem…until now.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    710 months ago

    No shit, having domestically sourced technology is a prerequisite to having any semblance of security.

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      1910 months ago

      They haven’t reduced their privacy stance, as far as I’m aware. In fact, the only public previous reduction was a concession to China over iCloud storage

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        And if you really want full privacy, storing data in Apple’s cloud storage was never ideal. Apple, like many other cloud storage companies, hands cloud storage data over to authorities if they’re given a warrant.

        On-device storage is a different story though. Apple has a no backdoor policy for the iPhone and iOS, which is why they’re constantly getting into fights with law enforcement and government agencies. On device backdoors would offer a massive security vulnerability that would be exploited by bad actors.

        • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Apple does have some advantages, in that you can enable encryption of your data so that Apple doesn’t have anything to turn over.

          But yeah, I still wouldn’t recommend them because they could disable that tomorrow.

          • Ghostalmedia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Even if they disabled E2E, the data would still be encrypted, and they wouldn’t have the key to force it to decrypt. Also, removing that feature would royally piss off their customers that they sold “security” to for a decade+.

            Personally, I use their cloud storage. IMHO, the risk is low and the convenience is worth it for me, as someone in the US.

            • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              Even if they disabled E2E, the data would still be encrypted, and they wouldn’t have the key to force it to decrypt.

              Since it’s all closed-source, we don’t really know that. Apple also controls the OS of your device so they could easily push an update that sends your key to their server.

              Apple has many privacy issues, but this ain’t one of them, in my opinion.