• CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If it is a risk, it’s not a very good risk then? Like the Prelude is a risk and it just seems like a bad decision.

    What do they gain by making a new car that sits in the luxury midsize sedan segment? Is it really selling better than upgrading the Accord would have?

    Also it seems Acura has been mismanaged for years, and investing their limited resources on a sedan seems kind of silly.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      If it is a risk, it’s not a very good risk then?

      That’s… what I said? Not a huge risk.

      What do they gain by making a new car that sits in the luxury midsize sedan segment?

      I’m talking about the Type S specifically. A car in a (mostly) dying segment when it comes to american manufacturers. One that might not sell in huge numbers but if received well would become an instant future classic, as the Blackwings but cheaper and more honda-like.

      Normal TLX is as safe as the previous generation, and it’s still not an Accord. You’re comparing Toyota to a Lexus.

      investing their limited resources on a sedan seems kind of silly.

      Why? They already make SUVs that sell well, might as well keep the sedans alive for their customer base, who want something Honda-sporty but more comfortable and presentable. It’s not like they have to make an entirely new platform, the new Integra is basically a Civic underneath down to the engine

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I meant the risk has a poor chance of return.

        One that might not sell in huge numbers but if received well would become an instant future classic, as the Blackwings but cheaper and more honda-like.

        What does Honda have to gain for this? Car manufacturers don’t get huge benefit for used car sales. If they cared about that, they’d offer a manual version.

        The Lexus up badging strategy works though. Lexus is far more successful than Acura.

        Why? They already make SUVs that sell well

        Except that’s not true anymore. The MDX hasn’t been updated and the RDX is basically cancelled and it’s reflected in sales numbers. That’s where they should’ve invested instead of into a low volume sedan.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Making a hot version of a car drives sales of regular versions, idk how else to put it. You build something cool and desirable but slightly unreachable and people will want to have the next best thing. Eg Maserati MC20, Giulia QV, AMGs and M cars of all sorts

          edit: also you’re misunderstanding what “up badging” means, it refers to people putting sti stickers on their WRXs and other trim fuckery like that, not coming up with entirely new models on new platforms that share some components with your lower tier brands

          • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            TIL about up badging.

            I get the point of making a hot version. The Civic Type R has been pretty successful. But again, it’s a dying segment. They’d be better off with a more successful SUV.

            • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              As a company sure, I dread to see the day hatchbacks and sedans die in favor of huge ugly SUVs though.

              Like the only hot SUV that doesn’t piss me off is ford puma st, because it’s not much bigger than what it’s based on, and things like Countryman JCW, X2, GLA AMG, smaller stuff basically

              edit: thankfully we still get more ILXs and TLXs imported than their SUVs, I think they’re neat

              • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Oh what market are you in? I don’t think they call it Ford Puma in the US. Is that a Ford Escape?

                There are plenty of hatchback crossovers that are barely SUVs: Crosstrek, Venue, Ioniq 5.

                • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Europe, Puma is their Fiesta-based SUV, and the ST is using the exact same engine as the FiST. Ford Escape is one size up I think