- cross-posted to:
- wikipedia@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- wikipedia@lemmy.ml
Thanks to Chaotic Enby for their proposal, which was accepted with overwhelming approval. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
Thanks to Chaotic Enby for their proposal, which was accepted with overwhelming approval. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
How are they going to enforce it
jimmy wales will personally show up to your house and stare at you creepily through the window
I think Jimmy is pro AI.
I’d assume the same way anything is enforced on Wikipedia, by making a stink in the discussion pages. There are existing processes for rule violations etc which I’m not intimately familiar with but which I’ve often witness unfold.
How are they going to detect it?
The default writing style can be adjusted with specific prompts.
There are plenty of people who follow rules, then there are plenty of people who are really bad/obvious when breaking rules. I’m sure it will reduce the noise and give people more time to review the rest.
And usually I assume people review by noticing a questionable section, then check for rules violations. LLM use is now another thing worth objecting to. I don’t think catching every single case of forbidden LLM use is really worthwhile.